On March 22nd, this journalist detailed the findings of a UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on “Israel’s systematic use of sexual, reproductive and other forms of gender-based violence since 7 October 2023.” That investigation focused primarily on the hideous, industrial scale rape and sexual abuse of male and female Palestinian detainees in Zionist Occupation Force prisons, a phenomenon so pervasive it can only be dedicated, determined policy, signed off upon and directed by the highest levels of the Israeli government.

Reinforcing that horrifying conclusion, buried within the Commission’s report are bombshell passages unequivocally charging the Zionist entity with deliberately committing “genocidal acts” in Gaza, consciously and intentionally “calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians as a group.” The details provided are irresistibly persuasive, and point to Israel being in flagrant breach of both the Rome Statute, and Genocide Convention. In a truly just world, the mainstream media’s mass omertà on this landmark ruling would in itself be a criminal act.

  • bobbyfiend@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Remember, kids: Don’t do genocide, or else after only two years of murdering people wholesale the UN might say something about it and let you keep murdering.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      lets how long it takes for countries to stop selling Israel the weapons used in the said genocide

  • Laser@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hard to feel bad for the genocided when they become the genociders! Free Palestine!

  • Libra00@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    If this is true then that’s great news. Unfortunately the article seems to have been written by someone who is very clearly biased against Israel and not ashamed of airing that dirty laundry in public (which, fair enough, that describes me too, but I wouldn’t trust me to write an unbiased article on the subject either) so I can’t take this single source’s word on it. I’ll definitely keep an ear out in case any more reporting gets done on it from elsewhere.

    Edit: To the people downvoting and replying to this: please read past the ‘biased against Israel’ part - especially to the bit where I say that I am also biased against Israel - before assuming that I’m some pro-Israel shill here.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Crazy, ain’t it? I’m pretty consistently amazed at the poor media literacy I find on Lemmy.

      Israel is obviously perpetuating a genocide.

      That being said, this source is not reliable due to obvious bias and/or being propaganda. When you see something like that you look for other sources that are fact based and dry.

      It’s weird, I see the same behaviours and fanaticism on Lemmy that I saw from Qs and f right wing nuts. Just coming from the left now. Fucking facts are getting hard to discern.

    • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Unbiased reporting (or unbiased anything for that matter) doesn’t exist. The sooner people realize that, the sooner they’ll stop letting the imperial media pull the wool over their eyes.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Then it’s a good thing I wasn’t asking for unbiased reporting. What I asked for was more reporting, because I would like to verify it with multiple sources. Unbiased reporting doesn’t exist, but there is in fact an unbiased (or at least minimally-biased) version of the news itself, and the most reliable way to get there is to hit a subject from multiple angles. If the people who love Israel are also complaining about it then it’s safe to say it’s legit, for example.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      SMH you do one ethnic cleansing and suddenly all the woke journalists are biased against you /s

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      very clearly biased against Israel and not ashamed

      As is any decent person who’s been paying close enough attention.

      Not all biases are bad, and being biased against a fascist apartheid regime committing genocide is an excellent proof of that.

      Having a bias against the Israeli government is having a bias in favor of accuracy and against atrocious human rights violations.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Did you not catch this part?

        which, fair enough, that describes me too

        I’m not saying the bias is a problem in general, it’s just a problem for the trustworthiness of the reporting because they could be reading stuff into the source material that isn’t there.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I’m not saying the bias is a problem in general, it’s just a problem for the trustworthiness of the reporting

          And I’m saying that you’re wrong. Everyone has biases, and my comment above still applies when you’re writing about it.

          I’d trust reporting that’s clearly biased in favor of the truth over the mealy mouthed forced neutrality of main stream sources any day.

          • Libra00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Everyone has biases

            Yes, which is why I try to get my news from more than one source so that I can tell whether or not it’s just someone reading something into a thing that wasn’t actually there or if multiple people with different perspectives have seen the same thing.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Unfortunately the article seems to have been written by someone who is very clearly biased against Israel

      Can’t take anyone seriously unless they’re fair and balanced towards a genocidal military dictatorship.

      I can’t take this single source’s word on it

      Fortunately, they link to the original material.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Also can’t take anyone seriously who can’t read the comment they’re replying to.

        Did you not catch this part?

        which, fair enough, that describes me too

        I am also biased against Israel, for what I feel ought to be some pretty self-evident reasons, but a single highly biased source reporting something is not news.

        Fortunately, they link to the original material.

        Yeah, fair enough, I just wasn’t up for reading the ~50 page report myself to find out if what they said was true.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I just wasn’t up for reading the ~50 page report myself to find out if what they said was true.

          You could Ctrl+F to find the relevant bits fairly easily.

          But this demand isn’t skeptical, it is cynical. “I don’t believe you because I’m offended by your tone” is miles away from “I don’t believe you because I haven’t seen enough evidence”.

          • Libra00@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            “I don’t believe you because I’m offended by your tone” is miles away from “I don’t believe you because I haven’t seen enough evidence”.

            It’s neither of those: it’s I want to believe you, but you’re the only person I’ve seen mention this and I want to make sure it’s legit by hearing it from multiple sources.

    • Piperpiper1@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bias is when you report the court ruling, the more you report the court ruling the more bias you have.

      I guess you guys are ditching the strategy of denying the genocide now, and moving on to “biased tone” or some shit idk.

      • Libra00@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Did you not catch this part?

        which, fair enough, that describes me too

        I am also biased against Israel, for what I feel ought to be some pretty self-evident reasons. Reading comprehension in the replies to my comment has been surprisingly low.