• vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    Those cameras are there since 90s I remember watching them in ActiveX in real media player plugin in IE. Nothing changed.

    • priapus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      What this is talking about is not really about the brand or model, its just about them being misconfigured. These cameras were exposed to the internet with either default credentials or no authentication.

      Theres very few good reasons to expose a camera to the internet at all, just access it over a VPN. If for some reason someone really needs to access it over the internet (I genuinely cannot think of any), then they should put some proper authentication in front of it.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        An IP camera may stay in use for a decade or more without any firmware updates. You shouldn’t trust any sort of authentication that’s built into the camera to be secure. Keep them on an isolated LAN and only allow access from the server that’s running the DVR software.

  • Zenlix@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even when they are protected, when did they receive the last update? There are probably so much more vulnerable IoT devices.