• hera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    12 days ago

    Love seeing open source projects from companies that aren’t specifically tech firms

  • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    12 days ago

    I saw the headline and was ready to rage about why they should just use signal instead. Then I read the article and honestly this is a fucking genius use of tech

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I read it and don’t understand. Why is this better than Signal? Or the 500 other secure file/messaging protocols?

      Jabber seemed to work perfectly for Snowden…

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        For one, ease of access. Say you’re trying to break a story, who are you going to message with signal? Because you’re going to need to get that contact info somehow right?

        Snowden is permanently stranded in Russia. That’s not exactly a great example of an anonymous source.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 days ago

          Say you’re trying to break a story, who are you going to message with signal?

          …The Guardian?

          Because you’re going to need to get that contact info somehow right?

          Use your browser? These are strange questions.

          Snowden is permanently stranded in Russia. That’s not exactly a great example of an anonymous source.

          Did you notice that I used the past tense?

      • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Messaging protocols already resemble the frameworks that come out from time to time. And their effectiveness is due to the fact that they require a certain quota of users.

        It’s just a secure messaging app with a direct line to Guardian journalists. How to use 911 or special numbers when you’re not feeling well.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Similar to other apps, CoverDrop only provides limited protection on smartphones that are fully compromised by malware, e.g., Pegasus, which can record the screen content and user actions.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    The tech behind the tool conceals the fact that messaging is taking place at all. It makes the communication indistinguishable from data sent to and from the app by our millions of regular users.

    Reminds me of how the Germans in WW1 knew they couldn’t trust their diplomatic codes anymore so they just sent the important messages in the normal, innocuous telegraph system and diplomatic pouches. They knew that foreign intelligence would be focused on the bogus secure messages.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      To sum it up even more : this looks like standard end-to-end encryption, but any app user have the same network traffic, completed with fake data if no communication is needed.