• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I hate T-Mobile, but I really hate Elon Musk. So while I’m not happy for T-Mobile, I do enjoy watching Musk suffer in any way whatsoever.

    • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, sadly SpaceX and Tesla are both very promising companies primarily held back by Elon Musk.

      • detren@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        SpaceX sure but Tesla has been in decline for so long that I wouldn’t be surprised if by the end of the decade it’s either irrelevant or sold off / taken from Musk.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Iris2 and Eutselsat OneWeb are currently massively expanding their network - for European coverage first,though, but with the explicit goal to be a Musk alternative.

  • corroded@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    This makes me think that the Starlink system is very poorly designed. I know there are hundreds of satellites, and a large number of base stations.

    Even if a large chunk of the satellites were taken out and a few base stations failed, shouldn’t the system keep working, just over a different path?

    This sounds very much not like a hardware failure, but more like somebody fucked up.

    • astrsk@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re off ten fold. They have thousands. Around 5000 with a planned 12k after gen 3 has been fully deployed. It’s definitely a “let the intern push to prod” type of scenario by numbers alone.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering it is designed by an American mega corp, yes it is probably poorly designed because they go for profit maximalisation.

  • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    HugesNet has low throughput but it’s pretty reliable. I had high hopes for Starlink but it seems to be a dud.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m sorry, but not even having a Musk backed product as my only alternative could get me to use HugesNet’s antifunctional service. Literally dialup is better.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      My coworkers mom paid $200 a month with a 20GB datacap for HughesNet and couldn’t even stream Netflix or Youtube. Their service is completely useless in 2025.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s been over a year since the last big Starlink outage. That’s a lot better than my old DSL provider.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I live in a country praised for its IT industry, digital government and whatever

          I got off ADSL in 2024. Fucking lol. I don’t even live on a farm or anything. Lucky to receive fiber though, now they want to prioritize 5G home connections instead.

      • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        yeah? For some reason I thought it had outages here and there all the time.

        Still, they were down for almost 3 hours today and that’s a lot worse than my old DSL provider.

        • troglodytis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          I have a place in the boonies and I use starlink. I find it to be vastly superior to the only other semi-viable option, line of site. Speeds aren’t as great as they use to be and I’ll be happy to change when another better or similar option comes along.

          I do experience mico-outages every few days. Like a 1 to 2 second drop that I would only notice with vid chats or gaming.

          I do have a media server and surf the seven seas. Starlink is crap for that, so I found a new home for it as I move my residence out here.

    • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Got a nice fibre-optic connection, have you? Try throttling that to <10Mbps and you might understand what some people have to deal with. DSL at 10Mbps from an evil corporation, or 150Mbps from an evil corporation, hmmmmm, what a choice.

      It’s easy to shit on the owner, but have some sympathy for folk who don’t have a reasonable alternative.

      • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hear hear!

        Everyone is like “Move out of the city, live a life closer to nature” but also “If you use the only service that truly enables that you suck!”

        I’ll take what I can get until something as good or better comes along.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Verizon is finally laying fiber optic in western maryland. I can’t wait to ditch Starlink and save ~$100 a month in the process.