• SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      This is literally just one extra search engine selection.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s funny that people get upset about one line in a config file that’s not even selected by default.

    • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I use librewolf via nix home-manager to declaratively configure preferences, plugins, engines, bookmarks, and policy settings. My librewolf configuration module is my largest config file by far… At least I don’t need to reapply it by hand anymore, but I really wish Firefox didn’t suck so much.

      Here’s hoping ladybird is a success.

  • berty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So it’s just another search engine option, they probably get money for that too. No big deal for me, I don’t have to use it if I don’t want to.

  • firepenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why does AI need to be shoved into everything, honestly its not AI its just an LLM that summarizes your search, and plays as a yes man.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I mean, if this helps fund Firefox and is not too intrusive then I am fine with it.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s totally “shoved” when it’s just an additional option in the search engine sélection…

    • tekato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      AI has money and Mozilla needs it. Are you going to pay for Firefox development?

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m not upvoting out of support for this move but to spread awareness

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 month ago

      Whereas I’m upvoting because I support adding options. If you don’t like it, don’t use it.

      • jqubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I really don’t know enough about Perplexity AI to have an opinion one way or another, which is why I’m upvoting for awareness. I can’t say whether it’s a good or bad thing, although I’m not optimistic given the general trend of shoehorning “AI” in whether it makes sense or not, but I’m sure there are actually useful applications for the product and a better search engine could be one. I want actual search results, though, not a generated slop answer.

      • Limonene@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Everyone already had the choice to use this before. You can visit any site with a search box, and add that site as a search engine to Firefox.

        This is forcing it down people’s throats.

  • sramder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Because it costs money to add shit nobody wants so we need sponsors, to add more shit nobody wants…

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Can you back it up with data? Or is it just what your bubble thinks? For whatever reason anti-AI sentiment seems very prevalent on much of the Fediverse, but the Fediverse as a whole is niche.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, he asked, like, both his friends, and they were like “nah”, so practically nobody on the planet uses AI, man.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just a search engine choice.

      I agree with the sentiment, but this is quite possibly the least offensive idea Mozilla has had in a while.

    • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I prefer waterfox but i normally use them booth as they are awesome (one just with the basic addons and the other with all the addons i want but they could break websites)

  • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I get that Mozilla needs to keep the lights on but… yeah.

    I’ve increasingly been meaning to switch to a fork. Anyone aware of a good way to self host a bookmark (and preferably tab) sync?

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Firefox adding another search engine choice isn’t really headline news to me but cool I guess, especially if it’s another option that’s not Google?

    I’ll continue using something else, though.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not a search engine, it’s a random text generator disguised as an engine. It’s worse than Google, if you can believe it. We don’t need more shit that is worse than Google

  • Let's Go 2 the Mall! ❌👑@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    pretty easy to just remove it as an option. settings/search/ scroll down to list of search engines, click perplexity, click remove. If enough people do this, maybe they will get the hint.

    • Limonene@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      How do I prevent new antifeatures from being added? How do I even know about the new antifeatures as they are added? Does Mozilla publish an RSS feed of each antifeature like this that they add, that gives a quick explanation of how to undo it?

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Thankfully it’s easy to remove yet. But this sneaky automatic addition is still annoying.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have no idea why they call it “integration”? It’s just a search option like any other search option.
    Personally I have 10 search options enabled already, so this is number 11, and if I don’t like it, I will just disable it, which is dead easy to do, with a button for the purpose of changing settings right beside the search options.

    I tried it for 2 terms I know very well, and the response was very good, but I would never trust an AI response without double checking.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ones that work well take your natural language input, spend time searching and offer results. Not summarize anything. How well does perplexity work in that regard I wonder?

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find that chatgpt and claude try to give you one answer and sounds mildly to very certain about themselves without giving references.

      Perplexity actually gives reference links for each claim it makes, which I find better because I can check it’s work and fork off and explore further myself at any point along it’s reasoning.

      As a definite AI Hater, I find it to be a good middle ground LLM / search engine