• _NoName_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been running a galaxy S9 for years and have never run into a bottleneck with it.

    Why do y’all keep needing more and more power packed into your phones? It doesn’t make any sense to me.

    • Prethoryn Overmind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “Why do you guys simply believe things should get better?”

      That is how I read this. More power, more efficiency, better tech is not a bad thing to want.

      Just because you want to hold on to a 5 year old phone doesn’t mean someone else doesn’t at least want to see efficiency in our pockets get better for the value we spend on them.

      Imagine if someone said, I have dial up internet. Why are you guys constantly wanting faster Internet speeds.

      It’s okay to want things to get better. You should not have the mentality of, “it’s just good enough.”

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is this better value? I have a S9+, still full day battery and runs everything.

        How is buying a new phone ‘value’. What value does this bring exactly? You bring up dialup as a compassion. Well, modern connections don’t tie up the phone line and are magnitudes faster (my Internet is 17,857x faster than dialup).

        What tangible thing has been added to Mobile phones in the last 5 years? 10 years? What real value. Pretty sure my phone has more features than any ‘modern’ new phone.

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The big reason is that you’re choosing to spend several hundred dollars to put your still perfectly performant phone in a land fill so you can have a percentage or two more performance.

        Your dial up comparison is not really a fair comparison, either. The S9 is not dialup in comparison to Samsung’s new galaxy phones. You’d have to go down to like a BlackBerry or a Nokia flip phone to have that comparison make sense.

        • Nerdulous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Let’s compare the S9 to the S23.

          The S23 has Wi-Fi 6E support, Bluetooth 5.3 support, twice as much base storage and RAM, 5G support, an in display ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, 3 high resolution cameras, 120hz refresh rate, twice as fast internal storage, a 33% larger battery, a much newer version of Android and to top it off a processor that’s roughly 3X as powerful as the S9.

          So to me it might not be fair to call the S9 dialup but I would say a comparison between broadband and fiber is pretty accurate. At the very least the other features are worth upgrading for if not the speed. Now I suppose the S9 is still a perfectly good phone to be used as just a phone but these things are really portable computers and the increase in processing power becomes tremendous in a short period of time.

          • jocz@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Does your home router support WiFi 6e? your accessories BT 5.3? Your phone carrier stable 5g?

            I can understand the battery and the screen improvement. But I also don’t think it’s as drastic as you claim.

            • TanakaAsuka@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              This is an android enthusiast community. For a lot of people here the answers to that are going to be yes, yes and yes.

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think its more about the power efficiency. Samsung’s exynos line as well as their few latest samsung foundry nodes are not known for being very power efficient, so I think people were holding for the Pixel 9 with a custom TSMC manufactured chip in hopes of it consuming less power and outputting less heat

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Because I wanted a foldy boi.

      That said, I plan on hanging on to my Z Fold 3 for at least the next half decade.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But I need to run a web browser at Mach Chicken so I can justify tossing a perfectly good phone for a new $1000 phone.

  • kib48@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    wasn’t it the Pixel 10 that was gonna use TSMC and Google’s fully custom design instead of recycled Exynos?

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We don’t know anything. I don’t see how Google is going to get TSMC fab time though. Unless the purchased it so far back for that time. They are way to small or maybe they’ll be on an older node and no the cutting edge on at that time.