Elon Musk says no primates died as a result of Neuralink’s implants. A WIRED investigation now reveals the grisly specifics of their deaths as US authorities have been asked to investigate Musk’s claims.

  • exohuman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was hard to read. Those monkeys suffered greatly. I understand the need for animal trials in a device such as this though. My question is do they really think they will be able to support humans for their entire lifetime properly who get this implant? I can imagine humans being told the company went under or something when it’s time to maintain their implant.

    • xuxebiko@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it was a difficult read. This was more animals being unnecessarily tortured than animal testing. and Musk’s lying about their suffering and deaths. He and his Neuralink team are psychopaths.

    • greenhorn@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve read about this exact thing, people with debilitating conditions who are offered state of the art tech to be implanted, but the company eventually folds and they stop maintaining or supporting it, so the people are left with a useless implant

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    While I’m all for the possibility of brain-machine interfacing so we can communicate better with our devices, there ain’t no way whatsoever that I’m putting anything that Musk creates inside my brain.

    • MrGG@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      You get it put in and suddenly you think Musk is a sexy genius, apartheid wasn’t that bad, and that Tesla cars definitely aren’t trying to kill you.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I’m all for the possibility of brain-machine interfacing so we can communicate better with our devices

      For the folks at home, the commenter I’m responding to is one of the ones who will be the death of us all in 30 years.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the ones who will be the death of us all in 30 years

        Naw, that’s the climate change deniers

    • Donebrach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How the hell could anyone think inserting technology into your brain is a good idea? Especially for the completely useless “benefit” of being able to “communicate with our devices.” Do you seriously want push notifications funneling into your subconscious? I’m guessing your takeaway from cyberpunk media is “ooo! cool hot murderbabes and gun arms!”

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is the grim reality of animal testing, which is why it’s always important to consider if a product is worth testing for.

    Edit, forgot the link: cracked.com/personal-experiences-1676-5-horrifying-realities-testing-drugs-lab-animals.html

    Cracked (rip) wrote an amazing first-person account of what animal testing is like. It’s basically an ongoing massacre. The animals aren’t even livestock or raw materials… they’re basically just stationery. Valueless office supplies.

    • magnetosphere@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, especially when it comes to medical research, there’s often no viable alternative. The horrible lack of ethics shown here provide a strong case for strengthening existing laws and oversight, however. I agree: we should have higher standards when considering whether something is “worth testing for”.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t that the definition of livestock?

      Business asset (stock) that is alive.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea Musk sucks, but there isn’t anything really shocking or surprising about the details of animal testing.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, but to then turn around and lie about the cause of death is super unethical and fraudulent to investors.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s… not nearly as bad as I was bracing for. They got infections (pretty common for brain implants) and the things got loose or broke sometimes. The critters were then euthanised.

    Musk is still a bald face liar, though. Especially about the “old, terminal monkeys” part.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Y’know… he’s pissed off a lot of people over the years with various stunts and statements, but to my knowledge he had not really done anything yet to really piss off PETA. Now, every political faction is going to have its range from more moderate, less aggressive individuals, to more … let’s say, hands-on, individuals. A lot of those on the left end up with groups like PETA or those anti-whaling guys, fighting for animal rights. While I often support their ideas, I must acknowledge that they are often more than willing to use methods based on expediency and effectiveness over legality or safety.

    They’re really not an enemy you want, if you could avoid that.

  • SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Musk’s remarks aside (because anything he says is basically filtered through is “”“grand visions”“”), the cases in the article seem like somewhat standard animal testing cases.

    The only borderline case would be Animal 15, imo. Having her live with an implant for “months” while it seems uncomfortable seems cruel, but even there I could see why they did it.

    In the grand scheme of things, it’s by far not the worst things we’re doing with animal testing. Be it rodents or primates.

    It some point, tech like this needs to be tested against living organisms (if we want to advance in this area of tech)

    • andresil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t quite normal, usually at these facilities in the case of 15, 22, and 20 especially show that the workers are not carrying out proper regular assessment and that the criteria for euthanasia for excessive suffering looks to be far to high. I only know the case of how this kind if testing is handled with mice (from my partner, and in germany) and all three of these cases would have been euthanized much earlier, not left to live on for a year or even days. As usual with Musk, he tries to cut corners and it only ends up hurting people and in this case animals unecessarily.