• MCk3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What software only works on Arch? If anything I see stuff that’s packaged for arch but can be installed from source on other distros without issue.

    Ubuntu-only software, on the other hand, is infuriating

    • seaQueue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There’s a lot of content packaged for the AUR that isn’t readily available to people using less enlightened distributions.

      I use Arch BTW.

      Seriousposting: a lot of software just isn’t packaged as deb or rpm because no one has taken the time to do it. The AUR is really fucking convenient as an end user. And yes, you should always skim AUR packages to be sure they’re doing what they claim to do and aren’t garbage, anyone can post anything. I have seen a lot of trash uploaded to the AUR.

  • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There are many things that can stop me from running a program but what distro I’m using is not one of them.

    Become distro-agnostic. Don’t be afraid of source code.

    • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously, look at what the pkgbuild is doing on Arch and replicate it by hand on your distro of choice. That’s all a pkgbuild is: a simple bash installation script.

      • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        AppImage and Docker has resolved a lot of that for me if its not in my distros package manager. It’s my goto for the same reason of just not wanting to deal with it.

          • sloppy_diffuser@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Premade AppImage or self-contained binary, I’ll usually drop it into ~/.local/bin.

            Something I have to compile, I’ll usually do in a dockerfile tracked in my dotfiles repo.

            Only thing I’ve compiled from source on my host in the last year is https://github.com/werman/noise-suppression-for-voice.

            Could just be my use cases now compared to 10 years ago, but I’ve just found I’m rarely compiling these days on the host system. At least the configure-make-install or ninja variety. I’m sure I install a package here or there that does it in the background. Numpy comes to mind or an AUR package with Arch.

    • rtxn@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      timely updates

      You mean I shouldn’t git pull; git checkout HEAD; sudo make install every day?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    You Linux people are funny.

    I just download the Windows versions and run them with Wine.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand any of this, my windows install is on a 120GB SSD, it’s full now and I can’t update my graphics driver.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    finds complete updated AUR package

    am running Fedora

    Proceeds to unpack AUR and reverse engineer what it does so you can get what you need

    True story for some stupid ethernet driver patch: alx-wol-dkms

    • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very very very rarely some stuff on it is sometimes orphaned or outdated, but it’s really fucking great to simply “paru” and the thing I want.

  • Smokeydope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    TFW you’re caught between being an average person and tech nerd wizard, just competent to copy/paste ubuntu-based install instructions in the terminal but get a headache trying to compile from source. I use Mint, btw.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I consider myself relatively familiar with linux, people come to me when they have issues or need help setting something up

      But compiling stuff from source? That still gives me headaches 😩

      AUR is love, AUR is life 🙏

  • czech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is what always leads me back to arch. I can follow an outdated 12-step guide to installing the software in Debian or I can install it with one command from AUR.

  • frippa@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a noob, isn’t every (open source) program aviable for every distribution if you compile it from source? It’s all Linux in the end (i never compiled a program from source, so I don’t know if it’s easy at all)

    • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usually the only tricky part of compiling from source is tracking down dependencies. The package manager does that for you normally but you’re not using the package manager when compiling from scratch. The actual building (even compiling a kernel) isn’t all that complicated.

            • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you need the python header files, depending on your distro, you may need to install python3-dev, python3-devel, python3, or some other variation on the name. For a novice, this might not always be obvious and they might not know things like apt-file are helpful for figuring it out.

              • uis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Huh. Shouldn’t apt install header dependencies too? I’m using system where every package comes with headers, so I don’t install headers separately.

                • thelastknowngod@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Debian and RedHat based distros typically do not bundle them together. The have separate -dev and -devel packages for headers.

      • Nefyedardu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it actually is, you just append the distrobox command before it

        distrobox enter arch -- yay -Sy appname

        • hottari@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A simple yay -Sy from Arch btw takes less computing power and doesn’t depend on an external dependency.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            But then you stuck with arch. I’ve never had any software that wasn’t a flatpak or in the Debian repos. I use Fedora.

            • hottari@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I would say you are stuck on Fedora too, what is your point?

              I’ve never had any software that wasn’t a flatpak or in the Debian repos.

              There are quite a number of them, hence the reason for OP’s meme.

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Really? I honestly have never had that problem. Can you name a few? (I’m completely serious. Don’t take this as sarcasm)

                • hottari@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  There are so many software devs that package AURs because Arch has made it easy for them to do so. No need to give examples if you are totally fine with your brand of distro.

                  But whether you’ll hit the minor snag OP memes about depends on your software needs.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But then you are installing it locally. The benefit to containers is they can be deleted. Containers allow you to have separate systems that are not apart of your main system. This keeps everything clean so you don’t have to worry.

        Also Arch is a unstable mess and requires updates way to frequently

        • hottari@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          But then your installing it locally. The benefit to containers is they can be deleted.

          This does not make any sense in this context. Or anywhere else if you want to get real pedantic.

          Also Arch is a unstable mess and requires updates way to frequently

          Arch can be unstable at times but that’s part of the deal as is with any distro you’ll install and use over time. Requiring updates frequently is also not a valid argument against Arch as you can choose when to update.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Arch ships to new of packages for my comfort. This leads to breakages if you don’t read the update notes. I want my system to stay updated automatically and Arch causes to many headaches.

            • hottari@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Software updates can potentially cause issues in general. This situation is not unique to Arch.

              There’s nothing wrong with a rolling release model where you get newer software that’s closer to upstream. In most cases, you get security updates faster and in some instances you get bug fixes & new features from upstream that will take weeks if not months to hit “stable” distros.

            • Empricorn@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Arch ships to too new of packages for my comfort.

              Sorry to be a grammar nazi but that’s the second time and it annoys some of us. It’s literally a different word with a different meaning!

    • dmrzl@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, most packages are auto-generated from those. When it comes to manually generated packages AUR should still be #1. Not that I ever missed any packages in nixpkgs…