Chrome version 147 silently downloads Gemini Nano’s weights.bin file to local storage, sparking major privacy, data, and legal concerns.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    People are shocked when the bad boyfriend (google) that people warned them about, do highly unethical things. That boyfriend only exists to use & abuse you, it has no other purpose anymore.

      • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        This argument irks me as it merely exists to wash the crimes of companies as if they exist on a different plane of existence where morality doesn’t exist and people pretend corporates are not just a bunch of humans in a trench coat trying to commit the crime without doing the time.

          • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Companies are created by and comprised of people. It’s very clear that the concept of a company is meant to extract wealth by immoral means while shielding the owners from accountability and consequences that being a normal citizen cannot afford.

      • Devolution@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        That boyfriend was once sweet, caring, quirky, and innovative once. He tried many things and was better than his older two brothers, the hip one who charged too much and the lame one that your parents were forced to deal with.

        Somewhere along the way, he forgot his roots and became Jennifer Lopez.

  • Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well I’m glad Google decided to bite the bullet and face the immense, Biblical backlash. So that Mozilla Corporation has a few new thoughts to ponder on.

  • plz1@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s roughly twice the size of the base app, if it’s the same as Edge, which on my machine is 1.82GB. It’s shady as hell, but “massive” is doing a lot of lifting in this headline.

  • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    But…
    Isn’t that a good thing?
    I mean, running an LLM locally is much more private than running it somewhere in the cloud at a provider that gets your raw data, isn’t it?
    All your data stays on your device, while making it much, much harder for Google to argument why it should be uploaded to their data centers.

    • slevinkelevra@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      All your data stays on your device

      You don’t seriously believe that, do you? They just use your device’s memory and CPU, thus your electricity to shovel through your data and then sending all valuable data to their servers.

      • irate944@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        For clarity sake, that’s not what’s happening here. (Don’t misunderstand this comment as defending google, I could write a book about how much they suck)

        The model downloaded is a LLM called Gemini Nano, and it’s used for things like “help me write”, checking if an incoming message is scam, summaries, etc.

        Don’t worry about it itself being a spyware. It’s not; but for argument sake, if we were to assume that it was: they already know a lot about you through their usual apps and services, and get a lot more info out of you through them. This LLM would hardly move that needle.

        The actual issue is that they download it for everyone, even if their devices don’t match the minimum requirements. And without consent. And to enable it, you need to go through several menus, as the default behaviour is to use the cloud (this could change eventually, my understanding is that in this update they’re just laying the foundation)

        But, it’s Google that we’re talking about. Last year they were sentenced to pay a fine for spying on users despite them having their tracking settings off. And it wasn’t the first time iirc. This kind of behaviour is par for the course with them

        • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s already been pointed out in multiple threads that the terms of service specify that even if it uses the on board model it still sends your queries to Google.

    • fpslem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      If the reporting is accurate, your data is still sent to Google’s servers for processing. This doesn’t appear to improve privacy, it’s more like an extension of the user surveillance business model that Google has pursued in the past decade.

    • BrightCandle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      If someone chooses to do that then yes its a better option, but 4GB of LLM shouldn’t just be shipped in a browser.

    • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m reminded of when they pinky swore that they weren’t dissecting your data in incognito tabs.

      They lied. And nothing ever really happened to them for it. Proof is that they still have the audacity to do anti consumer shit like this and not even think twice.

      Also if I was someone who wanted to run an LLM locally there are many options other than whatever crap google is putting out. You can’t trust them at all with even a morsel of your data.

    • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I choose to install and use an LLM on my device, sure. That doesn’t mean Google should take it upon themselves to ship one baked into the browser, with no way to opt out or remove it without it being re-downloaded.

      Assuming Google will respect privacy is certainly a take.