• lemming741@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 months ago

        I didn’t realize it was that high- im seeing that the average is around $15 a month, but I’m sure there are whales that hit that $600/mo

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          The problem is that only your heaviest users are going to pay to remove the ads, so it doesn’t make sense to price the subscription at any sort of average user. You need to slide the price point way up the distribution just to break even.

  • magnue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    2 months ago

    “subscribing to Instagram Plus ($3.99/mo), Facebook Plus ($3.99/mo), or WhatsApp Plus ($2.99/mo) will gain access to extra features, like profile customization, super reactions, and story insights, among other things.”

    I’ll pass on that.

    • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 months ago

      I passed on it a decade ago. Got out when shit was getting bad with ads, memes, and other stuff not actually “social”.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Notice almost all of this is outward facing. It doesn’t improve your experience, but it gives you a thing that others see. The goal is the same thing as children bullying other children to buy iPhones. They don’t know what the product is. They just built in features that tell you if other people aren’t using it, so you can make fun of them.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Genuienly hilarious.

    You would have to pay me to have an account on any of those apps.

    Oh, man, attention/validation addicts are really something.

    They monetized human insecurity. Amazing.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    For a few dollars per month, consumers subscribing to Instagram Plus ($3.99/mo), Facebook Plus ($3.99/mo), or WhatsApp Plus ($2.99/mo) will gain access to extra features, like profile customization, super reactions, and story insights, among other things.

    Ah, they’re doing the Discord Nitro thing?

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      For some types of businesses, particularly smaller ones, IG is literally a critical part of marketing. SEO alone often doesn’t cut it, if Google also takes into account activity on other platforms, and even then a majority of website activity comes from people seeing posts on Instagram.

      No clue how the most recent enshittification affects that, but I doubt the core recommendation logic will have changed radically.

      It’s fucked, but the tech corps sucking off each other makes self-employment hard if you don’t play their games.

  • pimat@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fuck all the way off with all this subscriptions to finally make this AI shit profitable. It won’t work and people don’t need all this datacenters. I really hate this timeline and all this billionaire bullshit.

  • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes! Amazing!

    The downfall is finally happening. It is one thing about scraping data from people for free, but most will never pay a cent for it.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re charging for premium features, not for basic access to the service.

  • LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Would anyone seriously pay a subscription for a messaging app? As long as I can send and receive messages that’s all the functionality I need and the second they try to charge for that, everyone will jump ship anyway.

    I guess Discord Nitro has existed for a while but I don’t know a single person who’s even considered it, never mind actually subscribe.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well, I paid 1 euro for Whatsapp back in the day because it was the only option besides SMS and so that 1 euro was way cheaper.

      These days I gladly pay a couple bucks for a chat app that everybody uses so that they can pay the bills without selling my data or being funded by a corrupt government.

      Which is went to Matrix, but it is hard to get people on the server I host myself.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      WhatsApp used to not be free, I’m talking about before meta bought them, and totally worth paying the subscription for as they were the one of the kind multi-platform messenger working with all the non-smart phones that have internet connectivity and ability to install 3rd party apps.

      And back when they charged for service they do not collect all your data.

      • LemmyEntertainYou@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remember WhatsApp telling me I only got a year free when I first started using it but they never asked for payment after that. Maybe that fell in line with Meta buying them.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    And people will buy it because they’re addicted, and will feel the need to get more dopamine by getting what others can’t. Feeling unique or exclusive until everybody has it. Then instead of getting rid of it, it’ll just have price creep like all other subscriptions until it’s $30/mo. You’ll only hear complaints about how expensive it got, not the fact they’re paying for something retarded in the first place!

    I mean, it’s terrible they’re offering it at all, but there are those dumb enough to pay for it, too. Companies just take advantage of it, and there’s nothing to regulate it.

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Honestly, if they did this instead of being the data collection, forced fed ads and manipulation machine that they are id think its great. But they’re going to be just as evil and now youre paying them which is stupid.