• dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ah yes, review the PKGBUILD for every AUR update. Luckily I do this while I’m rereading the ToS every time those get changed for all my software as well.

    When I finish that I intend to read the changelog in git for each of the commits since the last update.

  • Solemarc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hilarious that it’s JavaScript again, truely npm, pypi and cargo are obvious targets. Also, guys, minimise your usage of the AUR! I don’t use any AUR packages.

    Core > Extra > flathub >>>>>>>>>>>>> AUR

    Not that core/extra/flathub can’t be pwned but it’s harder then the AUR.

      • KianaTabion@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not the one you asked, but it’s a case of priorities:

        • If you want it to just work, then the AUR is probably the better pick. Don’t get me wrong, through; most flatpaks should (mostly) work like how you’d expect them to behave natively.
        • But, (Op)Sec-wise, the verified flatpaks win. No contest. Simply, because there’s no third party involved in the process. (And I haven’t even gone over flatpaks’ superior sandboxing.)
      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Minimizing AUR usage doesn’t necessarily mean not using it at all, but I would weigh those advantages carefully against the risk it brings. I would also recommend the people who don’t know what they are doing to not use it at all.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      alvr as in the vr streaming program for standalone headsets? that’s kind of a niche among niches. Linux VR users with standalone vr headsets that use that specific method.

      • NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I panicked a bit when I saw the news earlier today as one of those niche guys. Then remembered I had removed it for WiVRn a few weeks ago and don’t have anything else off the AUR. Double niche win lol

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually had the alvr bin aur installed on my old destop machine. Its just the only proper way for me on Quest to properly play any PCVR games. But i haven’t used nor updated that one in a while. My new arch machine luckily doesn’t have this installed but now im freaking out

  • GandalfDG@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    yikes, I’m glad I decided to switch to debian stable recently, not that it’s a foolproof system either

    • FiniteBanjo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, it seems like these sort of problems aren’t necesarily due to an insecure system like the AUR but moreso because of the target’s publicity and popularity which is definitely the case with the rise of CachyOS.