this statistic does not account for Tesla loyalists, as three-quarters of Tesla owners indicated that they would continue with EVs.
Some people just like Elon Musk
Bad headline. The text says “would consider”, which is significantly different.
Furthermore, they don’t identify the study at all, so I can’t even go look at it. I don’t see one on S&P Global Mobility’s site that looks like the right one.
Yeah, considering options is a sensible thing to do
Have had an Ev for a year. Would not switch back. I’m saving too much money.
Have an EV commuter car and a gas minivan.
No way I’m going back to double gas, I’m putting 25,000km a year on the EV and less than 5,000km on the van.
I’m saving a massive amount with current gas and electric prices where I live.
Still can’t even afford an EV to even think about switching back to one …
I’ve seen this crappy article posted to a few places. You can’t simply exclude entire brands of EVs.
If you’re going to exclude Tesla, why not also exclude the worst brand too?
This article was clearly aimed at ICE owners
By the way, here in Australia, this nonsense article also made it to drive . Com . Au which also pushes ICE cars a bit
The McGraws and the George W. Bush family have close ties dating back several generations.
Interesting to find out about S&P Global.
Plug in hybrids are the best of both worlds. Any of the Toyota primes would be the ideal vehicle for most people. Too bad it’s near impossible to get one even if you have the money.
Plugins are the worst of both worlds unless you pull in and charge every 50 km to not let the battery drain completely, because if that happens you just end up with an insanely heavy ICE car thats even worse on fuel than an ICE car without all the hybrid shit.
I have been driving one for years. I only put gas in it on road trips. No need for extra charging time just go. For daily activities I never need to use gas. You’re spreading from speculation, I’m speaking from experience.
Admittedly, they are heavier. You got that bit right. I still got 40mpg on road trips.
I drove a plugin for 2 years daily, it only did 12-13kml without battery and 30km on a charge. Granted it was a Mitsubishi Outlander phev which isnt exactly the greatest car.
So you took your experience with an admittedly bad car and generalized all other cars based on it?
If I buy a Kia I shouldn’t expect it to drive like a Bentley just because they both have an IC engine.
Now youre putting words in my mouth, the Mitsubishi wasnt a bad car, just wasnt great. The problem with plugins is that when operating as an ev its an heavy low performance low range ev and when its operating as an ICE car its a heavy low performance gas guzzling ICE car. sure there are a perfect spot where it makes sense, but it is damn near impossible to balance at that spot. If you want an ev for city driving then buy that and spend a little more time charging when going a long way from home. Or buy a more expensive ev that can go further on a charge and charge quicker. The rangeproblem on evs is near not existing where i live. A better solution if range is a concern would be an ev with a rangeextender like the bmw i3 where you are using the ICE only to charge the battery when necessary and therefore can be much smaller and lighter.
Hasn’t S&P Global Mobility been known to favor oil companies or had ties with them? I did some light searching and didn’t see a connection immediately but I thought they were tied to oil.
Either way, https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/research-analysis/does-the-auto-industry-have-an-ev-loyalty-problem.html is a direct link to the study. It turns out this is about luxury car loyalty and space issues.
The Bolt saw households that went for gas power mostly turning to Chevrolet SUVs and trucks.
That’s understandable as there aren’t many large cars for EVs. Something the VW ID Buzz will fix if everything they present about the car is true. I am super excited about it and I am typically not excited about cars.
In terms of range and infrastructure, I feel like one concept theory that was originally pushed around at the start of EVs almost a decade ago was replaceable batteries. Drive up to a station, swap the battery out with a full one, and drive off. That doesn’t seem like the direction we are heading but it might be a way to solve it. That said 200-250 miles with 30-minute charge times to get up to 80% should be enough for typical day driving in the USA.
That said, I also feel these studies reflect somewhat, not on loyalty for Musk but on brand loyalty. For a lot of people, Teslas are truly great and fast cars. In other cases, they are terrible. Not all of their cars have terrible build quality and there seems to be a point where build quality dropped. Equally, there are some great EVs out there including the Chevy Bolt. You can see that most Bolt owners are only switching because they need something bigger and still 63% of them would stay with an EV.
The issue is not price, range, or infrastructure. It’s a lack of choice and a lack of build quality.
