EA games have been off the menu for a very long time now anyway.
The screeching in here over a game none of you nerds play and that fans love is wild.
Nobody but people who want to screech will care.
Like, have any of you screetchers actually played the current version and understand the low bar and this imaginary grievance you’ve created.
There should be a law
The use of generative AI in NHL 27 was first reported by ESPN sportscaster John Buccigross, who also serves as the play-by-play man for EA’s NHL series. “They’re using some AI stuff now,” he said on the Chirping Zebras Podcast last week (via IGN). “They played me some stuff back in my voice. It’s like, wow, that’s pretty good. If it means less work and the same check, I’ll take it.”
[…]
something else Buccigross related about the process: The AI is sometimes off.
“They were playing me back some of my AI voice, and they’re playing it like, ‘Score! And the crowd gets out of their chairs!’” he said. “I was like, no, they’re not chairs. I know, AI, they look like a chair, but we call them seats. Little things like that, you gotta go back and listen because those words matter in sports.”
So they’re not just having the AI mimic his voice, but even create the dialog? That sounds really lazy
That sounds really lazy
Isn’t that the whole point of the generative aspect in this case? To be able to add more varied commentary that’s a little bit more specific to the play, rather than just generic, bland, recorded commentary that has to fit generic situations?
I wouldn’t say it’s lazy in this case, unless I misunderstand what you mean.
Plugging in a chatbot to commentate is absolutely less labour intensive than actually writing and recording dialogue lines and hooking them up to contextual situations. If it is getting things wrong, as he states in the interview, it’s lazy on multiple levels.
EA Sports: Challenge everything
Thank you for pushing back on that goal. I realise I was wrong there. Great idea.
And from what I hear it still repeats lines that have little to no context with what’s actually on screen. Such a joke
But that one commentator got paid the same and did less work, so the drop in quality is fine!
I wonder if he will get paid at all next year…
