• Herr Woland@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      One, Mathematics is the language of nature. Two, Everything around us can be represented and understood through numbers. Three: If you graph the numbers of any system, patterns emerge. Therefore, there are patterns everywhere in nature.

      • quazar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, no. Mathematics is an hallucination of ours we are trying to desperately map onto reality. I say this as a mathematician. When you look out into our reality, you know what we see? A curved universe. There is nothing in our reality that is truely STRAIGHT.

        YET, we creatures came up with such an natural thing as a straight line. Straight lines are a uniquely human hallucination. Its the logic we use to make sense of the world, but its a Rorschach test of our own making. You are attaching meaning to it because thats what our brains do. generate meaning out of chaos.

        I need to look no further than pi, which is a number that represents our feeble attempts to push the round universe into our square heads. Its trying to represent the curved universe as a straight line (and visavers) - and reality said : LOL, NOPE!! YOU get a number that is more illusive than the irrationals. A never ending non patterned number.

        All of nature is not based on mathematics. Mathematics is the language we use to describe nature. Thats like saying the Grand Canyon is BASED on book describing the Grand Canyon.

        1.) No its not. Its our language, not nature’s.

        2.) To a degree, yes. But thats because our brains are pattern seeking and pattern generating machines - not because nature follows a system WE made up.

        3.) Did I mention Pi yet

        Here

        https://i.imgur.com/a5ueCi5.jpg

        THIS is a graph of a discovery that I made in number theory. Does it look like it has a pattern to you? I think this is the most beautiful thing I’ve ever seen, because IT MAKES NO SENSE. which means, we still have a lot to discover and learn

        • Herr Woland@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Such a fascinating read, definitely changed my perception about mathematics and the world, I’m probably going to remember your view about the world time by time in the future. What makes your comment all the more interesting is that what I wrote was a quote from the movie “pi” which is about a mathematician. You’ve probably watched it but if you haven’t I really think you should check it out.

            • Vupperware@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Such a fascinating read, definitely changed my perception about copypastas and the Fediverse. I’m probably going to remember your view about copypastas time by time in the future. What makes your comment all the more interesting is that what I wrote was a comment from the post which is about a maths. You’ve probably seen it but if you haven’t I really think you should check it out.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Eh, no”. There are tons of actual patterns in mathematics, we didn’t invent the “laws of physics” we just slapped a framework on top for better understanding. Math isn’t a human invention, it’s our interpretation of how things work, and at the base of it all there are laws that govern “how things work” (even if we haven’t fully discovered all of them), it isn’t just randomness that we’re trying to apply patterns to.

          Using your example of pi, calling it “chaos” is disingenuous, because it’s a single constant that has a massive number of applications. That’s not random or chaotic at all.

      • Buttermilk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say there is no language of nature; there are things that happen, and we can approximate what happens using math. Math can be used to describe basically anything, so the fact that we can understand these things through numbers is not extraordinary.

          • Buttermilk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess I don’t know what you mean by that. My point was that nature doesn’t speak in any language. There are things that happen do to processes and conditions, we can describe those processes and conditions, we can use them to predict future conditions with math. But the base reality is that things simply exist.

      • Ookami38@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Literally everything ever has patterns that emerge as soon as you start looking for them. Math is only the “language of nature” in that the entire idea behind mathematics is that is must be consistent, otherwise it’s just useless.

        Basically, math deroved from the universe (specifically our study of it), and not the other way around.

  • Buttermilk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Three tress just sitting there in someone’s yard

    HOLY SHIT, Look at that, there’s exactly three trees, its like it’s reality is based on math or something :O

  • jerry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Incorrect, of course the universal language we use to describe nature is everywhere in nature.

  • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Our “universe” simultaneously is and is not a simulation because reality is relative to the seer. It’s a fun thing to think about but pointless due to our limited understanding on what would make one universe ‘real’ and another a ‘simulation’, since really they’re one and the same, just at different scales. It is interesting to think about though whether or not our universe has a parent universe which it exists inside of. And if so how deep that nesting goes. If our universe isn’t contained inside something else, does that mean our universe simply is everything? No way to really know.

    • rockstarpirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right. By whatever logic we deduce that our universe is simulated, it would be just as likely that our simulators are also simulated. And from there you get simulations on to infinity and a simulation becomes as real as reality gets.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone building the simulation was like “yeah, let’s simulate diarrhea and make people have it just for funsies”.