All history learned in school is biased, wrong or written by the conqueros. Even the recent news of the own country is told different by corresponding politicaly or economic interests. This is why the people don’t make the same mistake 2 times, but 50 times repeating the worst history, because politicians, lobbies and clerics want it so.
One time this Taiwanese guy showed up to a board game group and when he found out I was sympathetic to China he told me:
If you want to know more about the cultural and historical reason causing the seemingly crazy Chinese expanding ambitions. I highly recommend you read this book. It explains why Xi is being so aggressive these years and why it’s almost inevitable. It’s not the same logic most people in the world understand. Even most Chinese people aren’t aware it.
And he linked me to “The China Order” by Fei-Ling Wang. I skimmed it, and it was complete drivel.
The central thesis is that Europe developed a peaceful Westphalian model that led it to respect the sovereignty of states, throughout it’s history and into the present day (somehow ignoring the entire history of colonialism, the Cold War, etc), while China’s historical model was based around “tianxia” which basically means that it ruled the known world, which is why it will always be a big evil meanie out to conquer the world.
Apparently this is a whole genre. Taking random snippets from China’s thousands of years of extremely varied history and picking out anything that supports the thesis that China is just inherently evil. There’s tons of works with similar theses written by white people, but I really can’t be assed to skim more than one, Fei-Ling immigrated from China to the US and has a doctorate, and he still writes this crap, in a university press, I can’t even imagine how bad the shit written by “China watchers” and pundits gets.
What’s funny to me about this is that I once watched a film made during WWII produced by the US government, “Why We Fight: The Battle for China” which made the rather dubious claim that China had, “never once waged an aggressive war in it’s 4000 years of history.” Change your posture towards the US, and your entire history going back thousands of years gets rewritten.
It’s just so lazy and childish to paint all of Chinese history with such a ridiculously large brush like that, it’s unbelievable.
If you want some real slop, then look at Hannah Arendts “What is Authority”. I just reread it and I had forgotten how much she sucks.
Some bangers:- America was founded without violence
- Colonisation was peaceful
- Rome wasn’t a dictatorship
- Authoritarianism is a pyramid, totalitarianism is an onion
- Rome got authority from ancestors, we get it from law (stalin is the man in the onion)
- Greece had no concept of authority
- The slavery doesn’t count, that’s prepolitical because they had to have them
- All countries are authoritarian (which is good actually)
Rome wasn’t a dictatorship
The only state in history that actually had a post called “dictator” wasn’t a dictatorship XD
The slavery doesn’t count, that’s prepolitical because they had to have them
What in the ideology?
Its full of wack stuff. I guess its worth reading insofar as it lets you shit on her more effectively
Not Saruman’s proudest moment.

I mean, are you familiar with his military career?
i choose to believe he only killed nazis
Bro you can’t just let a cube rest unsolved like that. 🫣
It’s so real, especially in the Middle-Age.
Sprinkle in a little bias, a little propaganda, a little mythology, then lose 75% of the information, and you’ve got the Eastern understanding of Asian history.
Same goes for the Western understanding of Caucasian history, of course.
There is no discoverable objective reality when it comes to history. Not even the people in the moment at any given point in history really understand what’s going on. It’s all a construct.
There is no discoverable objective reality when it comes to history. Not even the people in the moment at any given point in history really understand what’s going on. It’s all a construct
What no historical materialism does to a mf
Great response, saved me from figuring out how to even engage with that.
Well functionally, it’s the same difference, because we’re all stuck drawing the cat with the material conditions of a shitty pencil and piece of paper.
What does the West (ie Western Europeans) and the people of the Caucasus region have to do with each other? 😅
Caucasian: of or relating to a group of people having European ancestry, classified according to physical traits (such as light skin pigmentation), and formerly considered to constitute a race (see RACE entry 1 sense 1a) of humans
Only racist boomers and fascists use 19th century “race science” terminology in the 21st century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race
I admit I only skimmed but what is the up-to-date terminology?
In this context I think it’d be most appropriate to say European history, and one can additionally specify a region of Europe if necessary. But I am no historian
I’ll update my terminology, thanks.
👍








