• SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Nvidia should have split the company into a home consumer company and a separate AI chip company.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      How exactly would that work? They still use the same microarchitecture so one would have to license that to the other and they’d also be natural competitors because whoever is left making the consumer chips would naturally want to also partake in the other market

      • thejml@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        If they were separate divisions in the same company, each with their respective target audiences, it should be fine. Something like Toyota & Lexus for example. Sure you can get a spiffy luxurious Camry, but it’s obviously not the same target audience as an LS450.

        And I feel like in time the structure of the architecture in gaming focused cards will deviate from the AI focused ones, which we’re already seeing to some degree.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    What gaming, the majority of consumer GPUs is businesses (CAD, media), should they rent that computing in the future, is that the idea? And where do they get their GPUs? Compute modules aren’t suitable for server-side rendering either. Did Nvidia execs also drink the AI cool aid; “AI will render it”?

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Source on it being the majority? Because last I heard, most companies in the world don’t do heavy CAD or video editing. The workstation cards are much higher margin though, those cost a ton

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think the point they are trying to make is… Huang may have seen a time when gamers were a part of their base… the new CEO will likely start from the position of datacenters only.

      Lets put it this way, we’re downgrading from Mike Pence to JD Vance… yes the bar was on the floor… but they will find a way to go so much lower.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      He’s always pushed side stuff, like robots and AR and artificial datasets, even in the LLM boom. But he literally designed their first GPU; I think he was there too long to ever lose graphics as a priority in his mind.

      Graphics isn’t just gaming. It never was. It’s forever been a mix of workstation stuff too.

      The fear is that a new CEO will just look at Nvidia as an AI ASIC maker, specifically.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Funny how Nvidia spent years telling gamers they were the future, only for AI data centers to become the favorite child. Huang leaving might accelerate that shift, but blaming one CEO’s exit for expensive GPUs is generous. The real problem is that selling chips to billion dollar AI customers makes gamers look like a side quest.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Their consumer revenue is now higher than their total revenue 3 or 4 years ago so unit counts can’t have gone down THAT much. I see a ton of graphics cards for sale, only 5090s are limited to 1 per buyer

    • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Depend on how recent your recent are. RTX 40 series is basically the last GPU they serve for gamer, by the time 50 series launch they already deep in bed with the chinese spy–i mean the AI rush.

      • Funwayguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I would argue it was before that when they sold out to cryptobros during the 30 series, and coming up with the xx90 cards to see just how much people would spend. You could even consider it a corruption soft launch to test the waters with regulators.

  • chconnor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nooooo 😭. I need something stronger than my stupid 5090. This is no life like this.