Google will begin deleting millions of inactive Gmail and Drive accounts in December::undefined

  • sronweb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see it’s normal for me. If an account is inactive, the user perhaps has created another account or not using Google services anymore its money saving if we consider all personal data, ie 15 Gb per user, which are stored and maintained without reason.

    • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, people went ape shit when they deleted YouTube accounts that weren’t active for years. If you don’t use something and aren’t paying for it, what right do you have to be like “keep this around, even though I’m not using it and it costs you money”?

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Jumping through hoops?

        Merely being logged in while using any of their websites or services any time in the last 3 years is enough to be considered an active account.

        Watching a single youtube video or doing 1 Google search or reading a news article or accessing one of those precious files you have saved on their cloud server while logged in once every 3 years is hardly “jumping through hoops”.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It won’t allow you to log back in without adding a phone number, even though it had been used during those three years

          They’re just trying to get rid of anonymous accounts

          • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So what’s the point of such anonymous account? Waiting for 10 more years till policy is changed by some reason or you finally figure out a way how to get a number that’s not tied to your name?

            I am surprised they did not have such periodical purges in the past.

            • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean, yes?

              Making it harder for the average person to keep their identity separate from their Google account is the point…

              They hadn’t done this in the past because they weren’t big enough to keep people on their service while degrading the service

        • pete_the_cat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a Google Voice number that I set up years ago and never used. They sent me an email saying “you haven’t used this in a while, send one text or make one phone call to keep the number active”.

    • coffeebiscuit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If that’s the case. They probably wouldn’t know this. And if they eventually do?… they probably forgot their passwords.

    • pazzeda@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      What kind of prison doesn’t have a computer that you can use every now and then?

      • jackoneill@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless you have a smuggled device you aren’t getting access to gmail or any other email in prison. They have their own monitored communication systems that charge the inmate absurd amounts of money to use.

          • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Generally speaking if the question boils down to “will this humanize anyone who isn’t white upper class” the answer in the US is going to be “no that’s not something we get” (but if you want a worse version of it we’ll gladly sell it to you)

  • rob299@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The good news, as others said is that Google claims that Youtube channels wont be affected, however I aasume that over time they’l go that rought as more people start to stream in 8k or beyond. At some point they are going to have to delete older content as hosting it all isn’t cheap. As big they are Google can only go so far for preservation when they keep boosting streaming video quality options.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, newer content is significantly more costly than older content, specially as Google can simply decide to show ads regardless.

      Old YouTube content is what? 480p? 720p at most? They have already re-encoded their entire video library, it’s super efficient. The real storage hogs are the modern 4K, 8K, HDR, 60 FPS video files.

      • rob299@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        the point is… are they going to rid of old content from an erra that less people remenber or current content that increasingly more people are likely to watch willingly to get ad revenue.

        in order to save on costs they are wanting to rid of older content ultamately one year of videos on Youtube can easily save gbs of storage and costs, right now they are starting with gmail but at some point I predict they’l adopt it to Youtube.