• scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Panic about Fukushima radiation is way overblown. One person died from radiation, a plant worker, days after the accident. There has been no big long term spike in cancer, either. Meanwhile many people died trying to evacuate who might have been safer if they sheltered in place. And 2k died from the tsunami. But what do people remember about Fukushima? Radiation! Nuclear is bad!

      • Drusas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was there during the disaster and I’ll just say that radiation is terrifying. You know that it’s all around you, but you can’t sense it in any way. That’s a special kind of fear.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m sure. And the government had a bias for action that led them to order evacuation. Evacuation isn’t terrifying, right? Well, unless you are elderly or in an ICU or there is already a flood and natural disaster in progress… They killed a lot of people with that fear based decision.

          • Drusas@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re talking to a disabled person. You’re just doing a different sort of fear-mongering.

              • Drusas@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I know all of that, but thank you for sharing it anyway. To be honest, you did. Your wording implied that I wasn’t one of those so severely impacted or that I somehow didn’t understand the gravity of the situation for the elderly and disabled.

                I know that wasn’t your intention, but it’s an emotional subject for me.

                • scarabic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well I’m sorry for playing any part in that. You had just told me you were there so I knew you had direct knowledge of the event and didn’t presume to tell you you didn’t.

    • lovesickoyster@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you ask these people what background radiation is they mostly just stare at you with huge bambi eyes.

  • willowisp_42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    To make it clear: it’s common practice to put water for cooling nuclear plants back in the watersource. The “feared” molecules Tritium and carbon-14 are common in this waste water. In lower concentrations, but thats the reason they dilute the water. That’s something China and South Korea do every day!

  • badhops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    well… there are these huge floating fortresses in the ocean right now… every day the people working on the reactor they will do a complex math problem… everyday the answer is the same… dilution is the solution… and proceeded to dump contaminated water into the ocean.

    gotta love the war machine