It’s funny that neither works.
Mandatory reminder that Stonetoss is a Nazi.
Lol except muskrat is a fake free speech absolutionist and will happily censor what he doesn’t agree with
FTFY.
Zuck would just be contemplating the data harvesting. He’s not really pro censorship, so long as the hateful stuff is buried in private fb communities. He couldn’t be bothered to turn off aspects of his site regarding the Rohingya.
And I dont want to give off the wrong impression about my stance on censorship, but if you’re curating social media content via a algorithm, you have more responsibility regarding the consequences then someone who’s just providing hosting.
he’s fine with hateful content as long as it makes line go up
Ah yes. The platform of “less censorship” where the dictator randomly says that he will treat “cis” as a slur.
Not whimsical censorship at all.
Lol.
AND banns his critics.
Also bans the jet tracker account after having publicly admitted that he won’t ban it.
Those sentences seem unfinished. It’s more like:
“What if there was less censorship (but only on people I agree with)?”
“What if there was way more censorship (but only on people I disagree with)?”
Needs more CUM
I dont know, doesn’t like, blocking the entire site to people without twitter accounts count as censorship?
Pebbleyeet is a nazi
What if we just let people run their own servers and allow what they want within the limits of the law and let them share that with who they want?
