Dependence on SpaceX has been a concern for the Pentagon, which wants multiple vendors of rides to orbit.

  • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 months ago

    The important part about this is that Vulcan doesn’t just use yet another Russian bought rocket engine. It uses BE-4, from Blue Origin. Finally, someone other than SpaceX building rockets. Too bad it’s the other out of touch billionaire with too much power and influence that is doing it.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Right? What could possibly go wrong by putting our future in space in the hands of a bunch of narcissistic dickbag billionaires?

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Nobody ever said it we start spreading into space, we won’t be taking all our current problems with us. Star Trek kinda gave us a rosy vision.

        • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s probably going to be more like the Expanse but more violent, oppressive, and jingoistic.

          • ferret@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            The expanse makes it very clear that there was no shortage of space oppression before the events that occur in the books

    • MumboJumbo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      SYLRC (Support Your Local Rocket Company) Seriously though, there’s a lot of new ones coming online and/or developing: Stoke, Astra, Relativity, Rocket Lab, etc… Yeah, it sucks that two of the behemoths are ran by egomaniacal sociopaths, but some of the other ones are bringing some cool tech and innovation to the table, and even getting government contracts.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well… Capability wise there’s still a huge gap between SpaceX and all the rest. The Vulcan is only competition for Falcon 9 because the DoD wants an alternative at all cost.

    • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, this is not a competitor in terms of cost or launch cadence. Just good to have any second option.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      they can compete in very specific cases - like heavy load to GTO. Falcon Heavy would require full expenditure of all 3 cores to match, which wouldn’t be much cheaper. Plus the larger fairing size helps with certain kinds of satellites.

      • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah, but gto with fairings bigger then even the extended falcon heavy fairing willing to accept higher costs is a very narrow use case, I doubt it would support the whole vehicle. I’m guessing they will get quite a bit of business from trying to diversity away from SpaceX though.

        • weew@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          the point is that it isn’t higher cost for those missions. Falcon Heavy will have to run at 100% expended mode which is nearly the same cost as Vulcan.

          And some missions and payloads outright exclude falcon Heavy, period. High orbit and/or large satellites.