• gk99@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 years ago

    I wish they’d just let it through already. The way it looks, nothing changes for PlayStation gamers, Nintendo gamers get access to CoD for the first time since in years, Activision’s back catalogue goes to a company that’s way more likely to use it for something other than cool easter eggs in Black Ops games, CoD gets more accessible overall by being a part of the subscription, and Sony’s complete market dominance gets another blow that once again forces them to compete and improve their platform.

    If anything, I wish the FTC had been this aggressive when it came to the Zenimax purchase. All that really did was give Microsoft the ability to make those games Xbox-exclusive (establishing a pretty scary amount of western RPG dominance) and plop them on Gamepass.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      What do you mean by Sony’s complete dominance? AFAIK they only dominated with the PS4 because Microsoft bungled the release of the XBOne by tacking a bunch of junk on it that turned people off. Furthermore, online play used to be free with Sony until Microsoft started raking in the dough by charging for Xbox Live so we can thank them for Sony and Nintendo following suit with their own subscription fees. Current gen has PS5 leading in sales despite their production issues contrasting with Microsoft having consoles on the shelf that apparently nobody wanted to buy, but how is that Sony’s fault? They don’t drive demand.

      I don’t see how Sony is the dominant one in this scenario.

      • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 years ago

        You don’t remember the Fortnite case where it showed that Sony abused their dominant position to force better terms from Epic and try to block crossplay?

  • Tinister@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 years ago

    I wish these appeal announcements would include whatever argument they have for how the lower court erred. It just makes “appeal” synonymous with “do over” the way it’s done now.

    • Thugosaurus_Rex@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 years ago

      It would be nice. From your specific wish I take it you probably already know, but for general discussion it looks like they’ve just filed the Notice of Appeal with the trial Court, which is entirely procedural and required before an appeal can be brought to the Circuit Court. We’ll likely have to wait for the briefing before we get the substantive arguments. Reporting on appeals really does give the impression that it’s like a second trial though.

  • Yewb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 years ago

    We cannot allow bobby kotick to enrich himself off the corpses of all the gaming companies he ruined anymore.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Whether you like their output or not, he’s turned Activison into an absolute monster financially. There wouldn’t be this much drama in them being sold if he hadn’t.

  • KoofNoof@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 years ago

    There’s a reason why my grandpa used to always refer to the FTC as “Fuck The Cranch”