• UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Holy shit, that is a sweet deal. What I think is more interesting however, is that it’s also kinda revealing that they think law works like this in the West - and also what level of control they think is acceptable for a state to have.

    • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is even more extreme than Douyin’s arrangement with the Chinese government lmao

      It’s so funny

    • hglman@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      What I like is that the west is the one failing to stick to its own stated principles of capitalism and private property.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        The US has basically always had some level of federal control over some private property, beginning with construction of the National Road in 1806. “Principles of capitalism and private property” as you describe it here is a much newer ideology popularized by Reagan in the 80s that’s still a libertarian fever dream much more representative of the US Republican party rather than “the West.”

        • hglman@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          No doubt, but it is the rhetoric of today. But this is still yet different than control of limited physical resources. It’s a company who built a product. It’s clear nationalism over principles.

      • Weslee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Tbh I’d say it’s more about the fact china doesn’t allow western companies in china to do what tiktok was doing in the us.

        • nekandro@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean… These terms exceed what Douyin does in China. It’s actually an insane level of concessions.

    • Poayjay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s the huge take away here. The Chinese can’t comprehend that the DOD doesn’t have a social media control division. Yes we have the NSA and stuff spying, but they don’t control anything.