Artists flee Instagram as Meta trains AI on their public posts, sparking privacy concerns. Europe offers opt-out, but US users have few options.

  • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When you eventually find out how to opt out and your content is fed to AI anyway:

  • Dendr0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    This AI debate is hilarious. Especially from a privacy standpoint, because if anyone were all that concerned about their privacy, they wouldn’t be posting sensitive stuff to things they don’t control, if at all.

    Add to that society trends towards an increasing population, societal pressure that frowns on any talk of how to stabilize or even decrease the population, and our ever increasing reliance on various black boxes that we dont even begin to understand, and you can see we’re heading in a direction that goes against privacy whether we want it or not.

    Easier to encourage people to make the conscious effort to not post what they dont want public than it is to change all the platforms involved.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      There are many legitimate reasons for people to post content publicly while not wanting it to be stolen by some “AI” scammers.

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no issue with privacy, my issue is they’re using my creations and content to train the very thing they want to replace me with.

      I don’t care if it’s a big tech company or some small independent developer, I don’t want my work used to create and train Ai models.

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have Facebook but ppl in my families that have photos of me with them do. 🙃

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s public posts then what’s the privacy concern? This is stuff that people are deliberately and explicitly making available for all to see.

    Also, the last paragraph of the article says that Meta is pausing this initiative after a request from Ireland’s Data Protection Commission. It seems a bit clickbaity to me to be hiding that down at the very end of the article.

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Movies are shown to the public.

        So are you charging people to view your Facebook profile? Or are you burdened with the expenses of having to host the movie in your memory? Lol

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never said that you could. Watching a movie and learning from it are not copying it.

    • 5oap10116@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      If its a public post, why can’t I use it to train my AI to make deep fake porn out of it? /s