• HKPiax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    150
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’ve never seen something as unhinged as Project 2025. I mean it, it sounds like a shitty “evil plan” cooked on 4chan, but it’s fucking real. Insane.

    • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s not just real it’s their actual political strategy. This isn’t fringe shit, this is what they will do when they take office.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      it sounds like a shitty “evil plan” cooked on 4chan

      4chan has several porn and LGBT boards. this is on conservatism.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but a lot of conservatives, and by extension fascists, are extremely hypocritical on the surface, except they like to use “hypocrisy” as a tool against their opponents, and by “hypocrisy”, I mean not following the strawman version of your ideology. I personally call this as “rulebending”, they’re manipulating their opponents rules to be even higher and thus choking them with it.

        On a deeper level they just want a lot of power, which includes them being above the law, as long as they’re loyal to the dictator/king. If project 2025 succeeds, expect one of them getting caught on live with real CP, maybe even raping a child, then will just go “so what? I can do this, you are not allowed to!”.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      If we’re talking about American politics in our lifetime, yeah this is tops. But it’s not history’s craziest politics by a long shot

  • makeasnek@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Project 2025 wants to:

    • Outlaw pornography
    • Outlaw abortion
    • Outlaw homosexuality
    • Eliminate all major checks on presidential power. Say goodbye to the system of checks and balances
    • Replace many federal workers with those who are loyal only to the president

    www.defeatproject2025.org breaks it down by topic, also highly suggest John Oliver’s segment on it

    • luciferofastora@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

      In this case, the law being freedom of speech, the protection being to say what they want and the binding being to prohibit others from curtailing that. Naturally, the push for inclusive language is part of a movement to curtail that freedom and needs to be reversed and pushed back against.

  • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Literally just yesterday I posted about it in my family’s political group chat and my older sister said, and I quote:

    “even though I lean left, I’m actually glad that conservatives have a playbook! Why? because Trump’s first term presidential transition (2017) was totally bungled… he needs a list of people that he can appoint from, so that these agencies don’t just fall apart… Don’t kid yourself, Biden’s team and Obama’s team and the democrats overall definitely have their own playbook and their list of potential appointees. They just don’t have to crowdsource theirs!”

    cue insane Charlie Kelly screams

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        One member got upset that we were discussing politics in the family group chat so much in 2020 (read: we were bashing Donald Trump and his fucking idiocy too much) and insisted we move the conversation elsewhere

        • jdeath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          would it be better to have two trump terms, back to back, or to make a biden sandwich and have a break between the terms?

          i worry that if trump comes back from the dead he might do crazier shit than if he was just re-elected and kept eating mcdonalds at the white house.

          no way to know for sure, unless whoever built the universe made two copies just to test this out

          • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m feeling confident that the 4 year break gave him and the actually smart people funding him and giving him ideas more time to come up with efficient plans

  • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    Ok ok ok…the porn is going too far and we all know that you all will be the ones suffering…so you need to work on your blatant lies… Your own president paid to sleep with a porn star for heaven’s sake

      • boatsnhos931@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        I pray to you Jeebus, Buddha, Allah, Satan, Giant sketti monster…PLZ HALP. I mean your own as in the Republican party’s president… sorry for the funky wording teddy brosavelt

  • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m not a capitalist but glad the free market regularly aligns with DEI. Thought the company I work at would back off a bit to the news coverage of outraged hysterics but they’ve doubled down.

  • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why would it be bad to terminate investigations that are unlawful or contrary to national interests?

      • funkajunk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        At first I naively thought “why is that a bad thing?”, but then realized who exactly decides what these “national interests” are?

        Definitely using some “weasel words” in their policy to get away with some shady shit.

        • pacmondo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Any law that you see that you think “Wow, no way they can enforce that! That would get EVERYBODY in trouble” is a law that is intended to be selectively enforced against unwanted people

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        That could be how you would mean it, but that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            4 months ago

            You guys literally just claim things without any evidence… You guys have lost to plot

            • irreticent@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              “You guys literally just claim things without any evidence”

              How ironic…

              You, just a few comments ago:

              “that is not how I interpret it or how they intended it”

              If you’re so sure of their intent then where is your evidence?

              You’re doing the exact same thing you accused the other commenter of; you literally just claimed something without any evidence.

              • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yes because I know what they mean because I have heard them explain the problem. You guys on the other hand dont know what they believe because you dont know anything about them.

        • TJDetweiler@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          If something is against “national interest” and your president is trying to become an autocrat, that means they can essentially pick and choose what national interest is. This should be setting off alarm bells in EVERYONE’S head as an obvious grab for power.

          I’m not american, so I don’t have direct skin in the game, but everyone on both sides of the political spectrum who don’t self identify as fascist should be against this.

          If you don’t interpret this as something extremely dangerous, you need to have a sit down and really think about the implications.

          • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            4 months ago

            So the issue is that this is not what they are referring to. What they are talking about is when the FBI (and CIA) get involved in politics or directly sway things in direction that is outside of what the FBI is for.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      In Hungary, state institutions like the police of the tax bureau only target people and companies outside of Fidesz’es interest group. That’s what they want to adapt, so every company will fall in line with Project 2025.

    • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Think about how many times in the last few months Trump has complained about the rigged trials. Now imagine him being able to unilaterally decide which investigations are lawful and which aren’t.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The FBI shouldnt be investigating the executive branch… The only way it should happen is if the congress calls for it, and that is what they are trying to do.