• Blxter@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    I’m sorry what. What is wrong about weight and fitness videos for youth? Watching those types of videos is what has lead me to lose 100 pounds in real life? Out of everything they have the option to restrict not that I want anything restricted to be honest.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They think being bombarded by them can cause body shame issues, and that teenagers are particularly vulnerable.

      They’re not removing access, just limiting the volume of recommendations.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        There a lot of fatties out there that think they are healthy and that someone who got visible ribs in anorexic. Heard quite a few stories if people going to the doctors and finding out they are obese when they thought they were a healthy weight.

        People need more education on this matter not less.

    • William@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      FTA: YouTube’s global head of health, Dr Garth Graham, said: “As a teen is developing thoughts about who they are and their own standards for themselves, repeated consumption of content featuring idealised standards that starts to shape an unrealistic internal standard could lead some to form negative beliefs about themselves.”

      And while I’m sure this is true, this is a minority of people, and they should seek help for their problem. There are far more who benefit from hearing about the benefits of a healthy lifestyle and how to achieve it.

      They should already be hearing that stuff from their parents and teachers, but I have my doubts. And they’re much more likely to listen to influencers than authority figures at certain ages.

      But the whole thing is even more pointless. They’re mostly influenced by seeing these beautiful people constantly on TV, movies, and Youtube, and thinking that they don’t measure up to them. Simply stopping some health care videos is going to do nothing for the problem and only prevent videos with the information they need.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m going to push back and say this is actually still a good move. You’re assuming the weight and fitness videos are created equal, and I can assure you, they are not.

        Most aren’t qualified to be sharing exercise or diet information, many are little more than to show off the person’s physique or sell a product, and some offer potentially dangerous or pseudoscientific advice that could sabotage a person’s progress.

        Knowing how to spot those problematic videos comes with experience, and I don’t believe teens (in general; there’s obviously exceptions) have a well-developed skillset for spotting bullshit.

        So while I agree this is probably a PR move, I think it will still be a positive outcome.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Yep.

        Something tells me that Google won’t be turning down fast food companies that want to advertise with them, or reducing recommendations of channels that show off/review fast food a lot.

        Maybe I’m being cynical, but this seems more like a “let’s get some good headlines” ploy than something that will seriously help anybody.

        I don’t know what the best course is, but screwing over channels that promote exercise and healthy living doesn’t sound like a good option to me. Even if they can exacerbate some people’s perceived body issues.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Weightlifting at certain young ages can be harmful. I’m not sure if that’s part of the motivation as I’m not certain what the ages are, but that’s something else to consider.

      EDIT: Typo

      • Blxter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Not more harmful than being obese. Or damage caused by body image issues.

        Obesity is one of the leading risk factors for early death Obesity is responsible for millions of premature deaths each year

        https://ourworldindata.org/obesity

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          I didn’t say that it is.

          But to your second point, as others have mentioned, body image issues are likely the biggest reason for the change discussed in the OP.

      • Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Every time someone claps to their own words, their intent is to antagonize instead of communicate a point

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I can do both for lazy shit like this. Fuck them if they can’t make it to paragraph 2.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        If the headline doesn’t describe the article, it’s clickbait and should be shamed.

        • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          Blah blah blah blah blah blah. It’s not click bait, or addresses the context. Read the article and you’d fucking understand your perceived click bait issue is imaginary.

      • Blxter@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        I did read the article and my point still stands. If idealizing people that are better than you wanting to be better than what you currently are Is now something that is bad than we have failed. No matter if it’s your physical condition, knowledge, wealth, anything. We as a human race should always push each other to be better than before.

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    wake me up when they limit teenagers from fascist far right grifters

  • Freefall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    Honestly, I just want to click on a video and not have my feed instantly become every video on that topic in existence to the exclusion of all else…meanwhile, someone I am subscribed to doesn’t show up on my front page when they put something out in a series I have watched 20 videos of…gj

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      The problem is youribe can only have one page of information and that has to be the front page offering old, new, expected and unexpected content in one easy to view list.

      You know what would happen if they had a second list that only showed your subscribed content? Literally no one would click on it and everyone would complain it doesn’t exist, they proved this in a test where they had that exact feature on every single person’s page since they started but here we still are people complaining that their subscriptions don’t always show up on the fyp (algo page)

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    It’s funny that any time these companies are brought up everyone says they’re dangerous yet the second one listens to the sorts of studies about negative affects that get quoted here all the time everyone suddenly decides actually its censorship or brainwashing or corporate greed and that it’s evidence they’re evil…

    Scientific studies said this content can harm developing children so they made efforts to mitigate harm, is it really so hard just to say ‘oh thats good, well done’ and if so then doesn’t that tell you a lot about your own motivations?

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    they’re not your kids. they belong to instatwitsnaptubetokbook

    so fucking glad i don’t have kids

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      That is the reason why you’re glad you don’t have kids? Because if you did you wouldn’t be able to control what information they receive?

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        one of many reasons. but really, if anyone only needed one reason, then the fact that they’re going to inherit a toxic polluted wasteland is reason enough