• rab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    One has a right to burn any book they own.

    If that offends you, perhaps it’s not the country for you

      • chatokun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Burning books like this requires enough targeted hatred and a need to offend the targets. It also is usually more effective if your target is a minority (not specifically racial, just a much weaker target), as that bolsters your position of power and lessens the likelihood of retaliation.

        Atheists sometimes have that much hatred, but at least where I am Christianity isn’t small enough to be a minority, so the fear of backlash might be holding back some of the hatred type atheists.

        Another reason may depend on why someone became an atheists. Many of us don’t hate religious people directly, we just have issues with what organized religion gets away with. People like me came to this conclusion by comparing scientific evidence to blind faith. By nature, faith will be more emotional and reactionary, whereas if you come to a position after learning and changing yourself, you’re more open to understanding why it’s not really a good idea to hate like that.

        Though I’d call myself agnostic vs an atheist.

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Burning books like this requires enough targeted hatred and a need to offend the targets.

          In other words… white supremacists can’t mainstream their ideology by burning Bibles.

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have heard of black metal. I have also heard black metal itself - I think I’ve heard elevator music that’s less boring than black metal.

    • JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Look, I am not pro russia or anything but like, how? The phenomena of people with ortodox muslim beleifs being really, really offended desecration of Quran isn’t exacly new. How would Russia play into this?

      • snaggen@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The guy arranging the burning of the Quran this spring, have been working for RT and have a Russian wife. The play here is to agitate Turkey to make the NATO process more difficult

          • theodewere@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            it’s a really cheap way for Russia to try to destabilize surrounding countries, where there are efforts to get rid of Russia’s influence by joining NATO and so on… there is no religious or intellectual debate going on… it’s just someone trying to start a fight… luckily the Swedes are far too intelligent to fall for it…

  • Peetabix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    When they set fire to the Swedish embassy in Baghdad (unsure if it was) as retaliation, what are the chances that there was a copy of the Qur’an in that building?

  • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    All these countries criticising Sweden for this like they have no understanding how freedom of speech and the right to protest work.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m always disturbed when Muslims actually are baited by this. They know the guys that set it up this way are not their friends, right?

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Burning a piece of paper that you rightfully own is not “attacking a religious group” and should never be construed as such. Objects are not people.

        Any sort of law that prevents you from doing something just because a specific religion doesn’t want you to do it is inherently forcing their religion upon you. That should never be allowed.

        • vd1n@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah but usually it’s just a dumb “eDgEy” thing to do. It’s the same as maga psychos burning books. Fuck all that shit.

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If someone wants to buy a book and then burn it I simply do not care what their reasoning is, It’s their book they can do whatever they damn well please with it as long as they aren’t literally using it to hit someone.

            I see a reason to ban burning ALL books in public, because it’s a safety hazard, but banning the burning of one book because they don’t want you to is a very slippery slope to enforcing other rules the religion wants. Two men(or women) kissing offends some Christians, should that action also be banned? FUCK that.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, when the maga types burn books, I roll my eyes and chuckle that they still paid the author for a copy. I remember video one maga book burning where a gay(?) man throw a bible in and drove off when the chuds realized what had happened.

            Let them burn books. You can’t destroy ideas that way in the 21st century.

  • interolivary@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reich-wingers saying that Islam is an "anti-democratic, violent and misogynistic religion/ideology” is just hilariously hypocritical. Not that I necessarily disagree 100%, but it’s not like SD’s values are really too different from your average islamist’s.