Immitation and simulation are not the same thing as they’re being used in this discussion. You’re literally arguing semantics to try and win, which means you have no logical point on which to stand.

An analogy doesn’t have to be identical to never the less share similarities. I even spelled out the part to consider: Just because two things are bad does not make them equally bad.

Depends on the workout. If they don’t target the abs in some way, they don’t generally get sore. Though compared to a good workout, doing a set of situps shouldn’t make them sore, but it sure does if I’ve been slacking off on abs!

Infinitely better than “intelligence” simulator.

No, it’s not simulating the intelligence part. It’s a mimicry at best that idiots anthropomorphise and misunderstand as a simulation.

The same way millions of fucking morons regular non-political people voted for drumpf: they thought, “well all politicians are bad, so it’s not like voting for a bad guy is bad.”

Most companies have loads of legalese attempting to protect themselves. Contrary to popular belief, that does not make them all equal.

Almost certainly not. Just like click-through terms (terms that are offered only by link with an Ok button) are not enforceable. It’s just there to dissuade those that assume it has any weight, which isclikely most people that are not lawyers or filthy rich who would consult a lawyer anyways if they got hurt.

It’s almost certainly on similar legal grounds to a cease and decist letter. You’re not being sued, you’re just being warned that they don’t like you via legalese.

Because 98% of them are on the corporations’ side because they practice insider trading.

Nope they won’t! Not as far as being in actual shape. Sure, many activities don’t need great abs, but every time I slack off and then give them a normal workout, they complain a lot after, which indicates they’re tiring a lot compared to other muscles.

But it’s not simulated intelligence. It’s literally just word association on steroids. There are no thoughts it brings to the table, just words that mathematically fit following the prompts.

I’m not saying his other work is bad, but The Last Jedi is unequivocal trash.

Genuinely, neat. I wonder how that all financially played out. It was probably mostly a tax deduction. (not that it was bad, but just to point at how the rich have faaaaaar more financial tools to motivate people than those who would ACTUALLY benefit from having access to such things)

Tell me you’ve never studied history without telling me you’ve never studied history.

Elder millenials that don’t care about this generational fuckery represent!

(oh crap I used elder millenial unironically am I part of the problem AHHHH!)

No, there isn’t. At all. What so ever. A soldier is merely a tool by a state that may or may not (and historically NOT) have good intentions.

A soldier is first and foremost instructed to FOLLOW ORDERS. Not because of some nefarious plot to use people, but because doubt on the battlefield can mean a weakness ripe for exploitation, and can introduce delays that mean defeat.

A soldier is a TOOL, not a freedom fighter.

A flippant joke based on a perspective I’m not even referencing does not in any way what so ever mean I am wrong.

Yes, and USB-C is barely a decade old. A single standard, about a universal by name port. Computer science, y’know the thing it’s all meant to benefit, is over a century old. There is a MOUNTAIN of standards we’re all standing on, whether or not you care to admit it.

No, you misunderstand the scope of standards I’m referencing. Computer science goes back over a century, yet you’re attempting to tell me there are no established standards based on something that’s barely even a decade old as a consumer product standard.

Yes I know the joke. My point is that it is only true for the developing front of engineering. Everyone is still, in fact, standing on a mountain of well established and followed standards while debating the future.

No way, it’s a MASSIVE pile of standards. The entire internet and networking in general only functions because of standards. HTML5’s main benefit was standardizing a ton of BS everyone was playing around with.

What isn’t standard are the few higher level frameworks and BS people are playing around with, but saying that’s all of the computer industry is like that old meme of Homer getting pulled most of the way up the mountain by sherpas in a sleeping bag…