So just more false bravado. Good

The 1960s ccalled and want their bravado back

So, you are calling for murder on the streets? Interesting

Pigs? They actually still call them that?

So it’s not up to you to determine if he should pay the the price of his life is it?

Assassination on a city street is around upon by local police. It doesn’t matter how rich the victim is.

I find some comments here disturbing. The man may have been not the best example of ethical behavior, but he is still a murder victim with a family who will no doubt miss him. No one deserves to be shot in the back on a city street. If that was true, it’s not long until your number comes up.

The internet is full of false bravado, and few morals.

Such is not the case here. Video shows there were many people on the streets at the time and the shooter was aiming at killing a specific person. This wasn’t an attempt at mass mayhem.

Hundreds of people are not targeted murder victims in NYC every year.

That is a shallow quake happening right off the coast. Not for nothing but move if you’re in the area.

I hope you have moved to higher ground if you live in northern California

Commit murder in NYC and I suspect the NYPD to be just as active especially when there’s video.

Kind of funny to say, but I’ve found that cops in the south treat everyone equally as bad, there are just more black populations in some places.

An assassination is a targeted murder, no matter the cause. It’s not getting in a fight with someone, or trying to rob someone. You mean to kill that exact person.

There aren’t often assassinations in NYC, unless you’re talking mob hits through the years.

You could write that headline for years. It’s like saying there are good blues clubs and BBQ joints in Memphis.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Gutting the enforcement division, you say? Go ahead, rich people, crime all you want! Nobody’s going to be watching!

Trevor Noah was right. Trump really does want to be dictator of a third-world kleptocracy.

Clearly this deals with issues of discrimination, of privacy, of autonomy that have been laid out in dozens of previous SCOTUS decisions.

Unfortunately I suspect that the right wing majority will decide this on their own policy preferences and their own bigotry - just like they did in Dobbs.