That’s the neat part …

They’re getting a cut.

They’re bullshit machines. They are specifically engineered to sound confident, with zero regard for correctness. They’re inherently unsuitable for anything that doesn’t need to be purposefully unreliable.

The problem is that LLMs aren’t actually automating away any significant amount of work, just transforming it for some unlucky few (developing -> debugging slop), and fooling c-suites into laying off people for the funds to invest in the empty promises.

Yum!

By what metric are those people “genuinely smart?”

You mean 2015/2016

You see that USB flash drive in the thumbnail?

Well it didn’t on that guy’s

I can’t find a list of supported devices, which is disappointing

It’s woke, there’s a black lady in it

Right, and that’s the exact sentiment I was expressing with my original comment about the NHTSA. We can and should expect a safety-first approach, and not just because that’s the most important problem that can be solved by autonomous vehicles.

Why are you are taking all of my replies to be personal attacks? And how are you thinking that you’re the OP?

I’m not sure that’s how prostate cancer works

Autonomous vehicles would be a huge imorovement for “last mile” transport. People don’t tend to have train stations in front of their homes.

I see you’ve never been to Germany

The goal is zero, at least stated by some of their competitors. People are just getting bent out of shape when faced with the reality that, inevitably, it’ll happen. Due to people being dumb and panicky and terwsistant to change, every implementation needs to demonstrate orders of magnitude more safety than human drivers in order to gain acceptance. This is why rogue companies like Tesla, and compilations of trash like this post, are making the industry look bad.

We already accept 3,400 deaths per day from human drivers.

If autonomous vehicles were to cause one death ever, would they still not be worth pursuing?

You are a hero.

It’s China