No, they have separate values that make their priorities in this debate separate from your own.

So was your third paragraph meant as sarcasm then?

Let me reframe my original question. How does making gender neutral bathrooms neutralize conservatives concern over restrooms? That’s literally what they’re concerned about.

This is bad faith enough where I’m just going to respond with the same level of bad faith: so by your logic gender isn’t a part of someone’s identity?

So this is the second comment I’ve seen trying to apply a sentiment that doesn’t actually refute the claim, attempt to refute it. The ability to change your appearance isn’t mutually exclusive to allowances being a beneficial data point for identifying someone. Not only is it fringe, but we already have multiple laws that deal with intentionally hiding your identity from the state or law enforcement.

What does that have to do with gender-neutral bathrooms?

What gender someone presents as needs to be tracked for drivers license to ensure proper law enforcement. Sex needs to be tracked for a multitude of medical reasons.

Your third paragraph confuses me. Why would conservatives be alright with this solution?

That would be tracking sex, not gender. Gender has no bearing on medical issues as it’s a social construct.