80% of bosses say they regret earlier return-to-office plans: ‘A lot of executives have egg on their faces’::As some business leaders accept hybrid work as a permanent reality, others are backtracking on earlier pledges to let employees work from home.

  • PhantomPhanatic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Working from home is a benefit that is worth money. People are willing to get paid less for the benefit of working from home all else equal. Effectively, if you got to work from home, you got a raise. Forcing people to come back to the office after allowing working from home is like giving a raise and then taking it back. I agree that this is shitty and sucks.

    However, when you negotiated your pay it was for a particular job with certain benefits. Complaining about your company not giving you a benefit that wasn’t initially part of your hiring negotiation is basically asking for a raise that they aren’t obligated to provide.

    Edit: I guess this isn’t a popular opinion. I felt I was contributing to a conversation that seemed a little one sided by offering an alternative look at it. From an economic perspective there’s nothing wrong about what I’ve said. I don’t agree that it’s a nice or even ethical thing to do, but the backlash (against companies that push for RTO) seems overly dramatic to me.

    • whatisallthis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      The way you keep employees and build a strong team is by giving them things you aren’t obligated to provide.

      • PhantomPhanatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, I’m playing devil’s advocate here. I love working from home and feel that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks in almost all ways. I agree with your sentiment, but without a good understanding of what companies are giving away and whether they can afford it is a big part of why back to office was hurried along.

        HR has to basically rewrite the book on everything after such a big shake-up in the culture of employment. New calculations for salaries, new requirements for liability, new hurdles for IT, infrastructure, and security. These are all costs to companies because the culture shifted. Working from home was mandatory for a short time, but it wasn’t obvious that companies could make it all work without time to sort out how to best do it.

        • whatisallthis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah the problem is there would never be any reason for companies to even try to make working from home work unless some life or death event like COVID forced them to.

          There was never going to be an easy transition for them. It was either nothing or against their will.

    • APassenger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They weren’t obligated to provide it, no. The local Taco Bell never did (essential).

      But once given (out of necessity), it becomes baseline. It is now the basis of comparison and part of the competition for talent. As many CEOs are finding out.

    • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      basically asking for a raise that they aren’t obligated to provide.

      Well, employees aren’t obligated to not resign either.

    • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doing the best work in the best place shouldn’t be considered a benefit given to you. It’s a benefit alright but mutually so.