• ThePac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t really know how people can expect YouTube to exist without some sort of income.

    The age of free content is coming to a close as VC funds dry up. Serving video is expensive.

    In reaction to this news from YouTube, I signed up for Premium. $12/mo for my main source of content? Easy decision.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, but it isn’t one ad anymore. it is two upfront, plus ads in the comment portion, plus random ads in between. The actual youtube app (without premium) is horrendous and I don’t blame people for using ad blocker or newpipe, vancetube etc

    • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thats more than most streaming services cost…l

      And youtube doesnt create the content… lol

    • grue@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Serving video is expensive.

      Only for copyright control freaks unwilling to use bittorrent-style multicast distribution. That’s a “them” problem, not an “us” problem.

      In reaction to this news from YouTube, I signed up for Premium. $12/mo for my main source of content? Easy decision.

      Congratulations on being a consumer removed, I guess?

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Serving videos is expensive, but gøøgl€ could file for bankruptcy and still continue hosting yt for a long time. gøøgl€ is not some small company with limited funds and them not getting ad revenue from yt isn’t going to bankrupt them in any way.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can get get slapped in the face every day without dying, but that doesn’t mean I shouldn’t be upset or try to prevent it.

        If YouTube is losing money for Google, why should they accept that?

    • Aagje_D_Vogel@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have premium as well. What really bothers me though, is the fact that if you use the incognito mode, ads reappear.

    • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everyone seems to forget one aspect… Google is constantly eating up your data, selling it to advertising companies and the what not. Now, last time I checked, Google owned YouTube. So, in my personal opinion, Google can have my data in exchange for no ads. Don’t get me wrong, i’ll still support my favorite creators through Patreon and all that… but screw google. I’m not buying premium when I’m forced to because of their greed.

        • JSens1998@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, sure. Next you’re going to tell me all the countries in the world have settled their differences and the world is at peace. Bullshit bud, they without a doubt sell your personal info. “If a product is free, you’re the product”.

          Dipshit.

          • KuroiKaze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seriously think about it for a second. Why would they put themselves in a huge competitive disadvantage by not being the ones with the data? Any data Google collects for the most part is housed by them and they expose only a very, very tiny fraction to ad partners.