Archived link

Yesterday, the West Virginia House of Delegates approved an amendment from Del. J.B. Akers ® to allow a child’s “treating health care provider” to examine a child’s genitals without the consent of their parents.

The amendment was actually an improvement over a previous version of the bill, which, state Democrats argued, would have allowed teachers to perform the genital examinations.

Akers’ amendment was the Republican response to one proposed by Del. Kayla Young (D), which would have banned child and adult genital examinations altogether.

“It’s unconscionable that Republicans would support legislation that authorizes intrusive visual inspections of minors without parental approval,” Young said. “West Virginians should be alarmed and disgusted by this invasion of privacy.”

It also says that all intersex people are “either male or female” but does not give a basis for assigning a sex to them.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    What level are they allowed to view? If the child says no are they able to force their way into their pants? At what point does it become rape?

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      139
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      A child cannot consent.

      So, immediately. It becomes sexual assault, at least, immediately.

      • Deello@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re looking at this problem all wrong, it’s not that children cannot consent. Nobody is arguing that. The change here is that now those that would be doing the tests are no longer considered child predators because they didn’t do anything illegal. So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc to look at random kids genitals to verify sexuality without any resistance from their parents/guardians. Is this how we finally do away with rapists, by redefining sexual assault.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc

          “treating health care provider”

          Some of these things are not like the others.

          • Deello@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            After COVID, many doctors left rural areas. This has left many communities across the country lacking proper “treating health care providers”. Who do you think is going to fill that gap for the purpose of this bill. Besides, most of the time the ones that are making headlines for this stuff typically have an R next to their name. But you’re right, some of these things are not like the others. And that’s kinda my point.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Unless…we can come up with some sort of legislation…totally important and necessary legislation, of course!

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 months ago

    We found the real freaks. I wonder if the Pizzagate/Qanon dipshits have figured it out yet: everything the qons do is about projection.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      If anything to go by their Hungarian counterparts, their only problem is “homosexual pedophilia”, while celebrate old guys who manage to hook up with actual teens as “real studs”, then blame the victims for the pedophilia, because “14 year olds back then played with dolls, not dressed like sluts”. And I was the one who felt bad for posting Railgun memes with “You know what are the number one causes of pedophilia? Sexy children” text onto my anime shitposting page…

  • oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    CORRECTION: Bill passed by WV lawmakers will not allow doctors to inspect child’s genitals to confirm gender

    An amendment introduced by House Judiciary Chair J.B. Akers on March 6 would have allowed medical professionals to “to visually or physically examine a minor child for purposes of verifying the biological sex of the child without the consent of the child’s parent, guardian, or custodian.”

    That amendment was adopted into the bill.

    Before officially passing the Senate, Senator Patrick Martin (R - Lewis, 12) proposed two further amendments, one of which clarifies “that the article does not authorize certain examinations of minor children.”

    Senator Martin’s amendment nullified Delegate Akers’ amendment, thereby excluding it from the final bill.

    SB 456 was passed by the Senate Tuesday 32-1 with one Senator absent for the vote. In the House, 90 delegates voted in favor, eight opposed, and two were absent.

  • ragepaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    Only a fucking piece of trash thinks it’s ok for a teacher to look at a kid’s junk, regardless of if the parents give consent.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    So wait… Couldn’t they just simply request a copy of a child’s yearly physical from their physician? For example, in the 90s/2000s, if we wanted to join a sport we had to get a physical from our GP of choice so the doctor can confirm it was safe for us to play the sport in question. It was a form the doctor and parent filled out, then gave to the school. I would think something like that was already a thing?? I also remember my parents having to submit certain medical records to my schools for other reasons… Why would anyone else need to examine these children???

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Ideally, if the politicians actually believed what they told their votes, then yes, they would do it that way. But… Trump was best friends with Jeffry Epstein. Nearly all the Maga billionaires visited Epstein’s island. The Republican party is full of pedos, sex traffickers and Nazis.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is stupid as fuck, right, but who doesn’t accompany their child into the doctor’s office?

    Like there are no circumstances under which I’m leaving my child alone with an adult who may examine their genitals and having had child safety training myself just being alone with a child that isn’t yours is a terrible idea altogether.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        ‘Doctors’ like someone who passed med school, flunked out of residency and couldn’t land a practicing job anywhere they were so god awful.

        But they are a doctor!

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        I suppose that hadn’t occurred to me because I live in a country where, if that were to happen, I couldn’t imagine the level of social unrest it would cause.

        It’s just beyond reason.

    • Caedarai@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think part if the motivation here would be to allow the doctor present at a school to determine whether a child is participating in the correct sex-appropriate placement. Like using the correct locker rooms or bathrooms in case teachers or other students bring up an issue (for example if a boy were to go into a girl’s locker room and claim to really be a girl). Since appearance doesn’t line up with sex in many cases nowadays, the inspection would be to determine the real sex of the individual. Some school activities will involve nudity (changing before entering a swimming pool, communal showering after a sports match or gym class, etc.) so the authors of this were initially pushing for any teacher (such as the supervisor in a locker room or the teacher of the associated class) to be able to inspect/determine the sex of the individual.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, however Akers Amendment from 3/6 was superseded by two other ones from Martin on 3/11 and according to local media coverage the bill that was ultimately signed into law doesn’t have Akers stuff in it.

        That’s why I posted the full text of the legislation that was actually signed into law. There’s no “amendment” or text that I can find in that legislation that matches the stuff from Akers. It looks to me like Martin successfully killed Aker’s amendments on the 11th of March.

        • Fourth@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, got it. Thank you. Was just responding to where the text in question came from.

          Big hell yeah for stopping that, will take whatever dubs we can get right now.

        • Fourth@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh, got it. Thank you. Was just responding to where the text in question came from.

          Big hell yeah for stopping that, will take whatever dubs we can get right now.