

You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.
My gut says he’s going to use the ethics in government act as an excuse to dump.
Not as much as you’d think.
Parent bullet point is the user. Child bullet points are communities they run/ran
I’m another mod of the community. Admiral didn’t let me know they were doing this.
I still 100% support their actions regardless.
If it’s a bug, wow. Almost 250 years, and they can’t fix it?
Also, judges are there to make sure both sides play by the rules.
It’s actually the conclusion of 2 things:
If both hold true, then logically, a jury can make a decision against legal precedent, without fear of repercussion - unless they are paid/coerced to come to that conclusion, and the defendant - once cleared by by a jury - cannot be tried again.
This means that legally, a jury can say GTFO to jury instructions set by judges.
Jury nullification is an important logical conclusion of American jurist rules. This post will stay up.
Pastime*
All you rich people who think you can break any law you want, let this be a warning roadmap
CTV changed the title after this was posted. This was the original title.
Because this instance (and all other instances) physically reside in countries with content laws. If we don’t follow those laws, we can be shut down, and the admin/owners that reside in those countries could face legal consequences.
Absolutely brilliant idea!
Already hooked.
This post has been reported for violating rule 4:
Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
The article has changed the title since this post was submitted.
Yeah… Not really.
Let’s think this through. If the president has immunity, then any order he gives falls under the same immunity.
If I tell you to steal, and anything I say is legal, you stealing would fall under that umbrella. What I tell you to do can’t be legal if you doing it is illegal.
Ahh. The good ole junk drawer.
I’ve had one in every home I’ve lived, even when I was the minor.
Wife says the same.
This comment was reported as hate speech.
America is a melting pot. As such, if this speech was against an idea, it’s no more hate speech that ati-fascist speech.
We have a ton of idiots advocating for billionaires, who would gladly toss us into a volcano.
While there are people that are good, enough bad people voted or didn’t vote that this comment breaks no rules.
Locking. About 50 reports. I’m a volunteer, and don’t have enough time for this.
Class traitor?
For upholding the rules equally?
I don’t like rich people, but glorifying murder is still glorifying murder.
Fuck off.
Do mean when we removed things that advocated violence? Do you honestly think it’s related to the persons job/wealth? We do that for any instances of people advocating violence that we see or are reported. All those were reported, numerous times.
You’re both wrong here. Stop, or you both get a vacation from this community.