• Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 个月前

    Nah, it would never happen.

    We would end up with comprehensive gun control reform before we ran out of our precious billionaires.

    • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 个月前

      Isn’t there some depressing statistic about 2nd and 3rd generations losing most of the fortune or at least losing any control over it.

      • orange_squeezer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 个月前

        There is, but it’s basically made up to support the notion that it’s very difficult to stay rich. It’s actually very rare for subsequent generations to lose inherited wealth, it just gets partitioned out so there are dozens or hundreds of rich people instead of one disgustingly wealthy individual.

        Similar to lottery winners losing everything, it makes a much bigger headline when one loses everything despite it being incredibly uncommon.

  • almizilero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 个月前

    If billionaires got shot as often as school children, only billionaires would be allowed to have guns within a week …

    • misteloct@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 个月前

      “Think of the Children Gun Safety Reform Act”, a 1,000% tax on guns. Guns now cost about $10-100k each.

  • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 个月前

    No you don’t understand they sacrifice dozens of kids every years to guns because they need guns to resist tyran- oh… NVM I guess.