• whileloop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    199
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If the world is going towards simplified logos, gotta at least make yours good. Firefox did that. Can’t complain.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m still going to complain.

      The new one is bland and I hate the bright colors. If it was the same but with the old color palette it would be acceptable.

    • tahoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I feel like it’s one of the best current logos. It’s simplified but not oversimplified and it looks really good.

    • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      78
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not it. Mozilla has ruined firefox. They have added spyware and made google the default engine. Most of their profits go to shady places, etc

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        1 year ago

        They have added spyware

        Uh, yeah; gonna need a source on this. You’re allowed to not like that they made Google the default search engine, but this statement is straight up-misinformation.

          • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Duckduckgo proxies bing search results (ober the api, they aren’t chad scrapers) and is therefore is under the foot of microsoft. This has forced them to whitelist ms trackers in their privacy tools but I haven’t heard anything bad about the search engine.

            Startpage scrapes google results so isn’t under anyones foot. It has had some controversy due to being bought by an ad company but they haven’t seemed to do anything bad yet

            In all, startpage is better than duckduckgo

        • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It keeps Google from anti-competitive lawsuits. So it’s mutually beneficial, although the first thing you should do is change your search engine to a more private one.

  • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The old logo is too busy and doesn’t look like fire. Ngl I like the new one, it feels like the fire is cradling the earth.

  • halvar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s neat especially next to the new thunderbird logo. IMHO it still has character and is not oversimplified.

  • Odo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wow. I’m surprised at the dislike for the old detailed icon. Maybe it’s being old enough to remember black and white icons, but I miss the increasing amount of colors that icons had for a while there. I hate the trend toward monocolor silhouettes.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is more the dislike of people hating on the new icon, like OP.

      Either icon is fine, you may dislike one of the icons but at the end of the day it is just an icon.

      You click it, it opens the software, and you move on.

    • 𝖕𝖘𝖊𝖚𝖉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Originally called Phoenix, since it was Netscape Navigator, reborn.

      But Phoenix Technologies disliked that, so they renamed to a descriptive name for the same immortal bird – Firebird.

      The Firebird database people would have none of that, so after a few-months gap between 0.x releases, they found the closest thing they possibly could which was not trademarked. It had nothing to do with the original name idea, fire being a weak link.

      And we’ve been stuck with that stupid name for two decades.

      • earthquake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        There was a satirical addon back in this day that would change the Firefox name every time you opened it to like WaterHippo or SunJackal to make fun of this.

  • Hot Saucerman@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “What happened to me? People care more about polished functionality than their privacy, and are willing to trade privacy for something that steals all their data as long as it is “faster,” even though I’m arguably faster than Chrome at this point…”

    Most regular ass people don’t give one flying fuck about being owned by corporations, they’re happy to get reamed by companies that don’t give a shit if they live or die.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no memory of the 2002 one and I swapped over from Netscape which is weird… I have a vague memory of their thunderbird logo looking similar at one point but maybe I’m getting them mixed up

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t it used to be called Firebird or something but had to change its name due to copyright? I remember when it was v1 and seeing advertising about it in the paper. It really did start the ball rolling in getting people away from IE. Chrome then came out and dominated.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I remember installing Firebird 0.6 off a magazine cover disk!

        I think I switched back to Mozilla pretty quickly as I was like “but this is just a browser, where’s email and IRC”

        I guess I didn’t originally get the point. Ended up switching back a couple of years later

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fine with the current logo. But, the 2002 logo looks rad. After that, the logo from 2004 is cool.