• LukeMedia@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve always thought Fahrenheit was the better measurement in regards to weather. 0 F is uncomfortably cold, 100 F is uncomfortably hot. It makes so much sense for the weather. 0 C is freezing, 100 C you are dead. Of course, for most things Celsius makes more sense, and even though I live in the US I don’t even know how to measure computer temperatures in F, it just sounds crazy. When it comes to weather though? Fahrenheit is where it is, in my opinion.

    Please guys, I know plenty of you will disagree with me, that’s okay, this is just my opinion. Please don’t get upset I know metric is generally better!

    • seejur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I always found fahrenheit a lot more arbitrary: in Celsius 0 is the freezing of water, so if you are driving/walking, that is a very important temperature to look out for. Also 30 being hot or 100 being hot outside does not really make a difference. Some people find 30 hot, some other find it OK, since its subjective anyway

      • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Water freezes at 0°C at standard pressure, sea level.

        If you are above or below, it will be different.

        Saying “It’s not 0°C outside so there’s no ice on the road” is dumb. Because there could definitely be ice on the road.

        You should be looking out for other things while driving. Not if the one thermometer, who knows where, is saying that it’s 0°C or not.

        • seejur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As usual, there should be a bit of flexibility in there. I am not saying “oh, it’s 0C, therefore ALL water in all town is frozen , lets wait until it gets to 1C so all water melt”. But more on the line “oh, its around 0C (+ or - 5C), lets be careful while driving because some of the streets might have ice”. Farenheit freezing temp is 32 I think? Thats VERY arbitrary. A lot more than C.

          • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            • or - 5°C

            23°F to 41°F is -5°C to 5°C

            If it’s below 40°F I’d be cautious of Ice. Once again, it doesn’t matter that water freezes at exactly 32°F at standard pressure.

            It’s like boiling water. No one puts a thermometer in water to make sure that it hits 100°C exactly.

            150°F water will scald you in a second (65°C)

            140°F water will scaled you in 3 seconds (60°C)

            120°F water will scaled you in 10 minutes (50°C)

            +100°F water has the potential to scaled you (~40°C)

            I’d rather know that +100°F water has a chance to burn me than remembering +40°C has a chance.

            That’s way more important knowledge than the freezing and boiling temperatures of water at standard pressure.

    • stalinblows@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fahrenheit is asking a human how hot it is, Celsius is asking water. This is what I was taught. I have no idea how you ask water for anything