Synology’s telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. “Pro-sumers,” homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology’s stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

    • Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 month ago

      They absolutely do. But it’s a symptom of capitalism. They must seek higher and higher profits each year. And this is one of their ideas to seek higher profits…

    • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I had known how bad it’d get I would’ve chosen a different field to work in. Sure, I can avoid it in my private life but on the job it’s like I’m in some kind of hostage situation.

      “Oh hi there customer! You know our product your users are accustomed to will only come as a subscription from now on and it’ll also be really bad and force full screen ads. We’ll push two updates per day because our unpaid interns are so agile. Bugs? Oh, no, we call those ‘micro disruptions’. They’re a feature but don’t cost extra! How much the license costs? Well, how much do you have? Yes, it’ll be that much.”

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    That’s a massive shot in the foot.

    As a Synology owner, I already had enough - they have arbitrarily cut customer support to sanctioned jurisdictions, leaving me without the support they promised and I expected when paying for a device.

    Next one will definitely be built from the ground up.

    • Higgs boson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are probably betting they will make more money from businesses. I.e., actual pros, vs prosumer.

      I do like my Synology NAS I bought 10 yrs ago, but these days there are more and better alternatives for people who dont really need to pay for the support and stability.

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember arguing with some nerd that this overpriced shit was not fucking worth it and my build based on old server parts I got from a local computer recycler was infinitely superior in every way

    I wish I saved that post so I could reply with this link. I feel so validated. Never trust companies. It’s why I say you should never fuck with plex, even if it is a bit easier to deploy than Jellyfin.

    • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yeah… Never had a specific “server” certified hardware and always repurpose my hold hardware stuff. Never failed me !!

      However, there are some functions specific to NAS’ like low power and other stuff people mention but I already forgot.

      IMO all this NAS and certified server stuff is good for Enterprise shit and the like… But for homelabbing it’s probably overkill and way to much overpriced for the little gain…

      Except maybe for the ease of use and plug and play function? Each one it’s own I guess !

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only reason I even have “server” parts is because they were dirt cheap at the recycling center. Before I used this my rig was an old pc from a doctors office I worked at they were going to throw away from like 2009. It was awful spec wise but it did the job. My current build is overkill but I wanted to play with vms and local LLM stuff and the hardware was cheap, so why not?

        low power is definitely something to consider though. That said there are some people that have made impressive builds out there. There are some low power builds on the unraid forums that use even less power than one of these things. It’s a bit more up front because it relies on some niche hardware but the power usage is so low it’s maybe worthwhile if you use it for years

        I just fail to see the benefit of these. Ease of use for sure but assembling a pc is really not difficult and installing an OS is not hard either. And an os like unraid or truenas is pretty simple to use, they hold your hand a lot. Like I get that running Debian is something not everyone wants to do but then it’s like, just don’t do that then?

        Frankly if you’re capable enough to configure the dockers you’d run on one of these, like plex or Jellyfin, I would think you could handle those things??

        • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          30 days ago

          Oh yeah sorry ! For the ease of use part I ment the NAS stuff which already comes bundled with all the necessary software to keep things easy but less customizable !

          Yeah if you get IT enterprise hardware for free it’s kinda similar to repurposing, sooo that’s a great deal and lucky you !!!

          But I would never put 1$ myself into specific server stuff ! Except if one day I want to contribute to the self-hosted/opensource community and host something like newpipe that needs to be publicly available.Then yeah, proper hardware and software stuff is mandatory !

          Sorry if my comment came by rude, that wasn’t my purpose !

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            No need to be sorry, I did not take it that way, we are best friends forever. More to clarify that there are a ton of old server parts out there for dirt cheap if you’re okay with saving e waste from the trash heap.

            You are absolutely right that homelabs are totally fine on consumer grade hardware but check server parts too, you might be surprised at the deals you find, especially locally. My build was a 10th gen intel build and cpu/mobo/32gb ecc ram/heatsink missing fan was $125. That was several years ago though and now we got tarrrrriiifffsss

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh, snap, bringing me the magic I need, but didn’t know to look for.

      I’ve been refusing to update because of video station. Looks like I’m saving your comment for later.

  • marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    Synology is like Ubiquity in the self-hosted community: sure it’s self-hosted, but it’s definitely not yours. End of the day you get to deal with their decisions.

    Terramaster lets you run your own OS on their machine. That’s basically what a homelabber wants: a good chassis and components. I couldn’t see a reason to buy a Synology after Terramaster and Ugreen started ramping out their product lines which let you run whatever OS you wanted. Synology at this point is for people who either don’t know what they’re doing or want to remain hands-off with storage management (which is valid; you don’t want to do more work when you get home for work). Unfortunately, such customers are now out in the lurch, so TrueNAS or trust some other company to hold your data safe.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      30 days ago

      Lol! Not like uGreen put any roadblocks to running your own OS (like disabling the watch dog feature in the BIOS and some other setting to enable custom boot).
      And you don’t have any fan control on their NAS. Either you estimate and configure correcrly or you need to schedule downtime.
      Actual servers let you live tune (some of) the power settings. Synology supports changing the fan profile in the live OS.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          29 days ago

          It’s not like you can’t do it (I did save the original SSD and replaced it with a new one and installed TrueNas Scale). It’s just not intended to do from uGreens perspective.

          Edit: I think I used either of these guides I used on how to open and how to install the new OS:
          https://youtu.be/BWNH_JzMNPc
          https://youtu.be/R8t-Wqx_E3U
          https://youtu.be/yh8Ao5ryOeE

          Oh yeah. The HDD indicator bays are partly non-functional as well.
          But you can restore some functionality with scripts you run periodically with cron. Juat search “ugreen dxp4800plus led cli github” to find it.

          Edit2:
          And I only chose a uGreen NAS due to the Kickstarter price. Because that was a 40% price reduction.
          At least I got a solid Model that is really nice. It also has a magnetic metal dust cover Ican easily remove if needed (even easier than the one on my pc case front panel which is a Fractal Design North)

  • Gibibit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Lmao what is Synology smoking. I have used their hardware in the past, now I’m so glad that I chose a Nextcloud setup for my home storage solution.

    Also why does the nonsense reasoning for these limitations always include “security”. That’s a rhetorical question btw, I know they are just making shit up.

    This comment by Frodo Douchebaggins in the Ars Technica comments sums up my newfound disrespect for Synology pretty well:

    Suck a turd, you enshittifying sons of bitches.

  • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    Welp, guess I definitely won’t be buying synology again in the future. I was planning to transition to a rackmounted NAS at some point and synology is overpriced in that category anyway but this puts the final nail in for me.

    It’s a shame because I quite liked the simplicity of their UI.

      • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That thing looks almost too good to be true for 500. What’s the drawback?

        Not available in europe? (It actually is available, I just checked)

        Loud as fuck?

        Bad Software?

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          You have to sacrifice a goat to it every time a drive hits 829374930 revolutions of its third platter.

          • Scrath@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Is that supposed to be a con? I don’t even use 4 bays currently and would be perfectly fine with a 4 rackmount NAS. 7 HDD bays sounds great to me

            • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              You asked the drawback on a thread about Synology.

              Doesn’t look like it hooks into their unifi ecosystem which would be a big negative for me.

              Edit: the pro does but what that even looks like idk

  • thequickben@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    I own a Synology NAS. It’ll be the first and last one I buy. When I need an upgrade I’ll go back to building my own again.

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’ve heard good things about Qnap

      but I also heard good things about Synology…

      Also on my first and last I think.

  • Alloi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    i was considering these devices for my home media set up, now im just building my own NAS with some old parts i had laying around and using open source software.

    fuck this shit.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Remember, there’s absolutely nothing wrong with buying a used 7th gen Intel PC and filling that with [insert drive of choice]. An i7-7700T is still more powerful than even the newer Synology units.