• Adobe has announced pricing changes to its Creative Cloud subscriptions that will take effect from the middle of next month.
  • It cited “continued innovation” as a reason to overhaul the pricing for its creative software suite.
  • The changes only affect users in the US, Canada, and Mexico for now.
  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It won’t stop until creatives stop paying.

    There are alternative tools available, but the number of people I have seen not want to learn a new UI is high. Adobe knows this, so they continue to raise prices.

    • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean it’s not just not wanting to learn a new UI. It’s that a company uses Adobe as it’s standard so if you don’t have experience with it they won’t hire you. And if you try to come in using a different tool they’re just gonna end up forcing you to use Adobe.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Is it the case that most creatives cancel their subs when they get that job? Does the job have a site license (assuming Adobe even allows site licenses)?

      • wondrous_strange@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I wanted to ask why don’t they let you pick your own tools and mid sentence I realized it must be because you won’t be able to share work with colleagues due to compatibility issues with files.

        Which means it’s bigger than the company you work for, but the same for anyone you might want to collaborate with.

        There must be some open file standard for creative stuff.

        Am I correct assuming that?

        • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean it’s not just file format problems as well. It’s also the fact that generally you’ll need a professional license for whatever software you’re using since you’re not using it for personal use and it’s probably cheaper and easier to buy a ton of licenses from one company then splitting it between different companies based on what people want. There’s also the fact that especially for bigger companies they’ll have custom tools and templates already made that work in that software. Some of that is file format for things like templates but any custom scripts or tools would probably have to be rewritten to support other types of creative tools. Plus at the end of the day it’s just easier if all of your employees are using the same tools so they can collaborate easier and ask for help on things easier.

      • AkashicOwl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How many users are actually working in a company that uses Adobe? Aren’t most users just casual, or even if they make money of art, working solo? (So, no need to conforme to an industry standard)

        I might be totally wrong tho

        • WarlordSdocy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I wouldn’t be surprised if at this point with the prices they charge, most of Adobe’s users are either working somewhere that has it, or are students who want to work professionally with it, or are people in between jobs who need to keep up skills in it for when they can go back to work. Most anyone I talk to who isn’t doing things professionally and doesn’t plan to go professional will use something like Gimp instead of Photoshop if cost is an issue.

          Outside of this though there’s also just the fact that it being the industry standard does tend to cause non-professionals to use it too. Whether it be because they view it as better then the alternatives, or they want to get experience in case they ever want to use it professionally, or they just haven’t heard of anything else and the tutorials they were able to find for what they wanted to do used Adobe products.

          Either way though I bet that the majority of the money Adobe makes is from companies buying tons of pro licenses rather than from individual people using it.

    • alehel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      So what are the best options now? Been away from the photography hobby for a long time. Looking for something to process my Fujifilm raw files and making small repairs to my family history photos.

  • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Serif has entered the chat.

    Edit: FYI every time you try to cancel your subscription they offer a year at $39.99 per month for a year. Last year I tried to cancel and they gave me that offer. At that price it’s a pretty good deal so I took it; well it just so happens that today that year was up and when I tried to cancel the offer popped up again. So i guess I’ll stay with them for another year.

      • Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes but so far no signs of enshitification as far as I can tell. I’m itching to switch to them but Adobe keeps roping me in. The thing that was holding me back the most was the lack of ai tools like erasing backgrounds and selecting subjects but it looks like they just added those features in February. So it looks like I’ll be evaluating who my graphic software provider for then year will be by the end of this month.

  • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I would argue that the open source alternatives to much of adobe software suite is better and free so fuck Adobe

    • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      You would be wrong. There is nothing close to Photoshop and many others. Sadly that is the case.

      • NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Still worth it.

        I’d rm -rf my computer rather than using adobi*** products.

        • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Exactly, you are not their target user.

          Many people, including myself until recently, would also do a lot to rid themselves of adobe, but for us it just isn’t possible.

          On the other hand, their subscription isn’t that high, compared to so many other subscriptions.

      • anon5621@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Well at least we have alternative for maya= blender ,premier = davinci resolve,about Photoshop yeah there no same level powerful tools the closest I used is krita.

        • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That works. I think I could probably get away with using Inkscape instead of illustrator, but it would be a struggle, because with it I can’t copy paste vectors to other apps. InDesign is completely alone in it’s category.

          Adobe is the standard everyone uses. You can’t be a pro and collaborate without it.

          It’s like 35€ per month. There are so many subscriptions out there now. Everything is a subscription. 35€ isn’t even that much anymore, considering all the apps you get.

          • anon5621@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Personally when I even using I don’t give them a penny ,always pirate edition and btw it’s possible to run Photoshop cs6 through wine.

      • GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Photopea has been great, probably not the best for power users, but it’s basically a clone of the Photoshop UI.

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    And theyre probably feeding your harddrive to an AI while pretending they dont know anything

  • scripthook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    After using Adobe CS6 for 10 years as refusing to upgrade to CC I switched to Mac and got the Affinity programs. Cost $50 for each of the Photoshop, Illustrator and Publisher equivalent programs with no monthly costs. Universal licensing across all platforms!

    Also the developers are in Ukraine

  • LiamClicks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Try affinity to replace photoshop it’s a one time cost and darktable for Lightroom it’s free.

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    We need Affinity Photo for Linux asap… Even on a VM both Affinity Photo and Affinity Photo 2 keep crashing for some reason…

      • FireWire400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes, but it doesn’t even install properly. There’s a custom fork of Wine specifically for Affinity Photo and it works somewhat but it’s very slow and crashes a lot.