Chris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 10 months ago10 to 100 Times Faster than a Starlink Antenna, and Cheaper Than Fiber: Taara Unveils a Laser Internet That Could Shatter the Status Quodailygalaxy.comvideomessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1122arrow-down13
arrow-up1119arrow-down1video10 to 100 Times Faster than a Starlink Antenna, and Cheaper Than Fiber: Taara Unveils a Laser Internet That Could Shatter the Status Quodailygalaxy.comChris Remington@beehaw.orgM to Technology@beehaw.org · 10 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareleopardpuncher@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down6·10 months agoAsked cgpt to compare lasers to microwave for data transmission; take with a grain of salt, but seems transfer rate especially isn’t comparable. 🔄 Comparison: Laser vs Microwave Data Transmission 📋 Comparison Table Feature Laser Transmission (e.g., Taara) Microwave Transmission Medium Free-space optical (light, like a fiber-optic cable without fiber) Radio/microwave frequencies (GHz range) Wavelength ~780–1600 nm (near-infrared) ~1–100 GHz Typical Data Rate 10–100 Gbps (Taara targets ~20 Gbps and higher) 100 Mbps – 1 Gbps (modern line-of-sight microwave) Max Practical Range ~10–20 km, highly sensitive to weather ~30–50 km, more tolerant of weather Line-of-Sight Requirement Yes, with tight beam alignment needed Yes, but more forgiving alignment Weather Sensitivity High — fog, rain, dust degrade performance Moderate — heavy rain can attenuate signal Latency Low Low Power Usage Lower power for same data rate Slightly higher power use Security High — narrow beam, hard to intercept Moderate — wider beam, easier to jam or intercept Deployment Harder — requires precision mounting and stability Easier — flexible mounting, ruggedized equipment Cost Higher upfront (optical gear, alignment systems) Lower per-unit, mature market Use Cases High-throughput backhaul (rural, terrain-constrained areas) Medium-throughput links, often as telco backbone 📌 Key Insights Bandwidth: Lasers have a much higher data capacity, similar to fiber optics. Microwave is far more limited in throughput. Range: Microwave wins in raw distance, particularly in less-than-ideal weather. Lasers struggle with any visibility obstruction. Stability: Lasers require precision alignment and environmental stability (wind, vibration can disrupt link). Microwaves are more forgiving. Security: Lasers are harder to intercept due to their tight beams. Microwaves, being broader, are more vulnerable to eavesdropping and interference. 🧠 When to Use What Use Laser Links (e.g., Taara) when: You need fiber-like throughput without laying fiber The link is short to medium range (under 20 km) You can ensure clear line-of-sight and good weather conditions You prioritize security and low interference Use Microwave Transmission when: You need a reliable, moderate-speed link over 30–50 km Operating in all weather conditions is a must You want easier setup with more flexibility in alignment Budget constraints are tighter
minus-squareHurlingDurling@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoSooooo… microwave is still better, got it.
Asked cgpt to compare lasers to microwave for data transmission; take with a grain of salt, but seems transfer rate especially isn’t comparable.
🔄 Comparison: Laser vs Microwave Data Transmission
📋 Comparison Table
📌 Key Insights
🧠 When to Use What
Use Laser Links (e.g., Taara) when:
Use Microwave Transmission when:
Sooooo… microwave is still better, got it.