https://archive.is/vt6mi

the US struck a secret agreement with Ishii. In a memo to General Douglas MacArthur (1880 – 1964), commander of Allied forces in Japan, Washington recognized that although war crimes had been committed, the experiments led by Ishii and his colleagues were “almost incalculable and incredibly valuable to the United States.”

In exchange for the records of Unit 731’s experiments, the US granted Ishii and his assistants immunity. Ishii died, and his collaborators went on to have careers in prestigious universities and private laboratories.

  • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    they didn’t really have the cards. usa doesn’t wanna give immunity? no experiment results. what are they gunna do? have another genocide just for science? it was literally the only chance for this information, and they had to give the worst humans that ever existed immunity to get it. it sure is a fucked situation and really makes you think. what god?

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      The US was in possession of the data but likely wanted the scientists to provide context in the same way they wanted the experience of the nazi rocket scientists. But lifetime immunity and a cover up is a horrible way to deal with the problem.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I’m pretty ok with reneging on a deal with war criminals, although I do acknowledge that erodes trust in future dealmaking with the US government.

    • MTK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      I guess it’s easy to say behind a keyboard, but still feels fucked up, was that really the lesser evil?

      • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        if we didn’t get that information, more people would have died. “justice” may have missed out, but justice doesn’t save any lives in this scenario. it’s a super fucked up situation, but i do believe getting that information was the best possible outcome. at least some good came from the suffering of the victims this way. it’s a hard pill to swallow, but nature is a bitch, we’re all only animals, and there is no god.

          • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            it is not direct lives, so there is no source. we learned information such as the exact temperature a human body dies when frozen, and things that advanced organ sciences and transplants. there’s simply no way to calculate the lives we’ve saved or improved from obtaining the information because it is so far reaching.