• HereIAm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The issue normally with these “trick” questions is the ambiguous nature of that division sign (not so much a problem here) or people not knowing to just go left to right when all operators are of the same priority. A common mistake is to think division is prioritised above multiplication, when it actually has the same priority. Someone should have included some parenthesis in PEDMAS aka. PE(DM)(AS) 😄

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The same priority operations can be done in any order without affecting the result, that’s why they can be same priority and don’t need an explicit order.

        6 × 4 ÷ 2 × 3 ÷ 9 evaluates the same regardless of order. Can you provide a counter example?

        • HereIAm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          So let’s try out some different prioritization systems.

          Left to right:

          (((6 * 4) / 2) * 3) / 9
          ((24 / 2) * 3) / 9
          (12 * 3) / 9
          36 / 9 = 4
          

          Right to left:

          6 * (4 / (2 * (3 / 9)))  
          6 * (4 / (2 * 0.333...))  
          6 * (4 / 0.666...)  
          6 * 6 = 36
          

          Multiplication first:

          (6 * 4) / (2 * 3) / 9  
          24 / 6 / 9
          

          Here the path divides again, we can do the left division or right division first.

          Left first: 
          (24 / 6) / 9  
          4 / 9 = 0.444...
          
          Right side first:  
          24 / (6 / 9)  
          24 / 0.666... = 36
          

          And finally division first:

          6 * (4 / 2) * (3 / 9)  
          6 * 2 * 0.333...  
          12 * 0.333.. = 4 
          

          It’s ambiguous which one of these is correct. Hence the best method we have for “correct” is left to right.

          • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Maybe I’m wrong but the way I explain it is until the ambiguity is removed by adding in extra information to make it more specific then all those answers are correct.

            “I saw her duck”

            Until the author gives me clarity then that sentence has multiple meanings. With math, it doesn’t click for people that the equation is incomplete. In an English sentence, ambiguity makes more sense and the common sense approach would be to clarify what the meaning is

            • HereIAm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              100% with you. “Left to right” as far as I can tell only exists to make otherwise “unsolvable” problems a kind of official solution. I personally feel like it is a bodge, and I would rather the correct solution for such a problem to be undefined.

              • 100% with you. “Left to right” as far as I can tell only exists to make otherwise “unsolvable” problems a kind of official solution

                It’s not a rule, it’s a convention, and it exists so as to avoid making mistakes with signs, mistakes you made in almost every example you gave where you disobeyed left to right.

            • until the ambiguity is removed

              There isn’t any ambiguity.

              all those answers are correct

              No, only 1 answer is correct, and all the others are wrong.

              Until the author gives me clarity then that sentence has multiple meanings. With math

              Maths isn’t English and doesn’t have multiple meanings. It has rules. Obey the rules and you always get the right answer.

              it doesn’t click for people that the equation is incomplete.

              It isn’t incomplete.

              • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                15 days ago

                Can you explain how that is? Like with an example?

                Math is exactly like English. It’s a language. It’s an abstraction to describe something. Ambiguity exists in math and in English. It impacts the validity of a statement. Hell the word statement is used in math and English for a reason.

                • Can you explain how that is? Like with an example?

                  I’m not sure what you’re asking about. Explain what with an example?

                  Math is exactly like English. It’s a language

                  No it isn’t. It’s a tool for calculating things, with syntax rules. We even have rules around how to say it when speaking.

                  It’s an abstraction to describe something

                  And that something is the Laws of the Universe. 1+1=2, F=ma, etc.

                  Hell the word statement is used in math and English for a reason

                  You won’t find the word “statement” used in Maths textbooks. I’m guessing you’re referring to Expressions.

                  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    15 days ago

                    Those rules are based on axioms which are used to create statements which are used within proofs. As far as I know statements are pretty common and are a foundational part of all math.

                    Defining math as a language though is also going to be pointless here. It’s not really a yes or no thing. I’ll say it is a language but sure it’s arguable.

                    And again laws are created using statements. I have plenty of textbooks that contain “statements”

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            It’s ambiguous which one of these is correct. Hence the best method we have for “correct” is left to right.

            The solution accepted anywhere but in the US school system range from “Bloody use parenthesis, then” over “Why is there more than one division in this formula why didn’t you re-arrange everything to be less confusing” to “50 Hertz, in base units, are 50s-1”.

            More practically speaking: Ultimately, you’ll want to do algebra with these things. If you rely on “left to right” type of precedence rules re-arranging formulas becomes way harder because now you have to contend with that kind of implicit constraint. It makes everything harder for no reason whatsoever so no actual mathematician, or other people using maths in earnest, use that kind of notation.

            • The solution accepted anywhere but in the US school system range from “Bloody use parenthesis, then” over “Why is there more than one division in this formula why didn’t you re-arrange everything to be less confusing” to “50 Hertz, in base units, are 50s-1”.

              No, the solution is learn the rules of Maths. You can find them in Maths textbooks, even in U.S. Maths textbooks.

              so no actual mathematician, or other people using maths in earnest, use that kind of notation.

              Yes we do, and it’s what we teach students to do.

            • HereIAm@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I fully agree that if it comes down to “left to right” the problem really needs to be rewritten to be more clear. But I’ve just shown why that “rule” is a common part of these meme problems because it is so weird and quite esoteric.

          • Right to left:

            6 * (4 / (2 * (3 / 9)))

            Nope! 6 × 4 ÷ 2 × 3 ÷ 9 =4 right to left is 6 ÷ 9 x 3 ÷ 2 × 4 =4. You disobeyed the rule of Left Associativity, and your answer is wrong

            Multiplication first: (6 * 4) / (2 * 3) / 9

            Also nope. Multiplication first is 6 x 4 x 3 ÷ 2 ÷ 9 =4

            Left first: (24 / 6) / 9

            Still nope. 6 × 4 x 3 ÷ 2 ÷ 9 =4

            Right side first: 24 / (6 / 9)

            Still nope. 6 × 4 x 3 ÷ 9 ÷ 2 =4

            And finally division first: 6 * (4 / 2) * (3 / 9)

            And finally still nope. 6 ÷ 9 ÷ 2 x 4 x 3 =4

            Hint: note that I never once added any brackets. You did, hence your multiple wrong answers.

            It’s ambiguous which one of these is correct

            No it isn’t. Only 4 is correct, as I have just shown repeatedly.

            Hence the best method we have for “correct” is left to right

            It’s because students don’t make mistakes with signs if you don’t change the order. I just showed you can still get the correct answer with different orders, but you have to make sure you obey Left Associativity at every step.

      • AnotherPenguin@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Another common issue is thinking “parentheses go first” and then beginning by solving the operation beside them (mostly multiplication). The point being that what’s inside the parentheses goes first, not what’s beside them.

        • Another common issue is thinking “parentheses go first”

          There’s no “think” - it’s an absolute rule.

          then beginning by solving the operation beside them

          a(b) isn’t an operation - it’s a Product. a(b)=(axb) per The Distributive Law.

          (mostly multiplication)

          NOT Multiplication, a Product/Term.

          The point being that what’s inside the parentheses goes first, not what’s beside them

          Nope, it’s the WHOLE Bracketed Term. a/bxc=ac/b, but a/b( c )=a/(bxc). Inside is only a “rule” in Elementary School, when there isn’t ANYTHING next to them (students aren’t taught this until High School, in Algebra), and it’s not even really a rule then, it’s just that there isn’t anything ELSE involved in the Brackets step than what is inside (since they’re never given anything on the outside).

      • The issue normally with these “trick” questions

        There’s no “trick” - it’s a straight-out test of Maths knowledge.

        the ambiguous nature of that division sign

        Nothing ambiguous about it. The Term of the left divided by the Term on the right.

        A common mistake is to think division is prioritised above multiplication

        It’s not a mistake. You can do them in any order you want.

        when it actually has the same priority

        Which means you can do them in any order

        • HereIAm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          “A common mistake is to think division is prioritised above multiplication”

          That is what I said. I said it’s a mistake to think one of them has a precedence over the other. You’re arguing the same point I’m making?

          • I said it’s a mistake to think one of them has a precedence over the other

            And I said it’s not a mistake. You still get the right answer.

            You’re arguing the same point I’m making?

            No, I’m telling you that prioritising either isn’t a mistake. Mistakes give wrong answers. Prioritising either doesn’t give wrong answers.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Next they’re going to have an epic debate on whether work done by the system is positive or negative and are all going to feel really smart and passionate about it. Like one of those Science vs Religion debate clubs from the 2000s