• leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    I still wonder, what’s stopping vendors from producing “chonk store” devices. Slow, but reliable bulk storage SSDs.

    Just in terms of physical space, you could easily fit 200 micro SD cards in a 2.5" drive, have everything replicated five times and end up with a reasonably reliable device (extremely simplified, I know).

    I just want something for luke-warm storage that didn’t require a datacenter and/or 500W continuous power draw.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cost. The speed of flash storage is an inherent quality and not something manufacturers are selecting for typically. I assure you if they knew how to make some sort of Super MLC they absolutely would.

      • leisesprecher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s not inherent in terms of “more store=more fast”.

        You could absolutely take older, more established production nodes to produce higher quality, longer lasting flash storage. The limitation hardly ever is space, but heat. So putting that kind of flash storage, with intentionally slowed down controllers, into regular 2.5 or even 3.5" form factors should be possible.

        Cost could be an issue because the market isn’t seen as very large.

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Flash drives are much worse than hard drives for cold storage. The charge in flash will leak.

      If you want cheap storage, back it up to another drive and unplug it.