• mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I don’t think they really plan to replace workers with robots. It fulfills two other purposes:

    • Keep the work force humble by threatening them with permanent replaceability.
    • Keep the stock holders happy. This shit simulates “innovation” like the delivery drones 10 years ago.
    • MangioneDontMiss@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      if its actually feasible and it reduces cost, then it will be the plan. right now though, its bullshit. As soon as people start stealing and destroying these 5000-500000 dollar robots all of the potential profit goes out the window.

      • mustbe3to20signs@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I may lack imagination but I can’t see a future where the materials and skills needed to build such robots get cheap enough to replace humans.
        Especially if they get trashed and stolen every once in a while.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Even if you make them in large quantities, material cost alone will be at least €50k. You will need a skilled operator nearby, and constant maintainance, and if you lose even one per year, a regular underpaid human worker will be much cheaper.

          These things are pure marketing devices to pacify investors, generate headlines and make unions and workers afraid.