cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31344860

Disregard all rules, Get this to anyone you know in the US military now

A tweet states that National Guard or Active Duty military ordered to violate constitutional rights can call the GI Rights Hotline for support, with the number 1-877-447-4487 provided.

    • HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      11 days ago

      I dont think so, but If you think it has, contact JAG. Went to lookup if they have hotline, CAL GAURD JAG was apparently a trending search…

      no hotline but front desk # for CAL GAURD JAG is 916-854-3505

      not the same thing but UCMJ reports and legal questions are JAG’s bread and butter

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Reminder that “I was only following orders” is not a valid defence. It wasn’t at Nuremberg, and it isn’t now.

    • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      If nazis win this time, there wont ever be a nuremberg, because the planet will go through rapid climate change and everyone is gonna be dead.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    What would make anyone look at the last 80 years of US foreign policy, and not realize they’ve been following illegal orders the entire time? You think this is where they’ll draw the line?

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh – sorry, I understand the protests are about immigration, which is not exactly a domestic issue. I’m talking about the deployment of the national guard.

          • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 days ago

            The deployment of the military domestically, using tactics and technology that were field tested in Israel and US battlefields, is inextricably linked to our foreign policy.

            The implication that there is any division between the two topics is insanely obtuse.

            • jsomae@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I was expecting you to have a much deeper connection than just “it’s the same tactics.” Like yeah obviously if you learn something in one place you can apply it to another similar situation.

              • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                9 days ago

                Same tactics, same soldiers, same commanders, same weapons, same policies…

                What’s different, besides the location? Only difference I see is that the rules of engagement are much stricter for soldiers abroad, while demonically they can fire on anyone they want and attack the press without consequence.

                • jsomae@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 days ago

                  Right, but my point was that the location is different. The OP’s image contains this text, which you might not have noticed:

                  violate the Constitutional rights of US citizens

                  Anyway, if your point is that “GIs aren’t going to care about the fact that these are US citizens,” then I more or less agree with you.

  • Hellsfire29@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    Don’t blame the soldiers. Blame the politicians.

    I went to Afghanistan. Does that mean that the war is my fault?

    Newsom has the same power to control the situation as much as Trump. Both sides pander to their base.

    Also, fuck Bush for extending our tour just for more soldiers to die.

    I can understand deporting violent criminals. But people who are contributing to society in a positive way? Seems counterproductive to the mission of protecting communities.

    Illegal immigration is still a crime, however. People who arent a criminal after that should be given a second chance if they’re productive members of society.

    Oh well.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Don’t blame the soldiers.

      The State is deploying National Guard troops on community members to defend ICE. I said nothing about assigning blame to anyone, but now that you mentioned it, I will emphatically blame National Guard members who follow this disgusting order. Otherwise, I don’t care about assigning blame to anyone at the moment.

    • JuBe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      “Illegal immigration” actually isn’t a crime, it’s a civil infraction — like a speeding ticket.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Simply being ordered to Kent State wasn’t the soldiers fault.

      The ones antagonizing students and eventually pulling triggers though?

      There’s also no evidence that undocumented people are any more violent than current citizens. Many are bigger contributors to our society.

      Also, blame the politicians? Oh, I’d also blame your fellow soldiers and neighbors since many VOTED FOR THIS.

      • Hellsfire29@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        If the protestors engage the national guard soldiers? May God help both of them. I know the nasty guard won’t shoot unless their lives are threatened, so I hope no one does.

  • MisanthropiCynic@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 days ago

    Do we really believe that the kind of people who sign up for the military have this much reasoning ability?

    The whole point is to mould them into unquestioning footsoldiers.

    They aren’t as bad as police who have to actively try whereas someone can just “fall” into the army. But still, they are enemy combatants and can’t be expected to follow reason.

  • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    11 days ago

    If the sort of person who was part of those organisations cared about rule of law, none of them would have boarded planes to Iraq. Appreciate the optimism though.

    • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Maybe this is libbed up, but someone here probably knows a national guard volunteer, at least some of whom probably don’t want to go out and fight their fellow community members for ICE.

    • derek@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      All people are born ignorant to their material circumstances and the conditions necessary for them. Disadvantaged folk often have a more difficult path out of that ignorance. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs provides some insight into why: one rarely has capacity for deep introspection when they’ve been deprived of basic needs.

      The US Military (among others) purposefully recruit more heavily in economically depressed areas. This has been true for decades. These two facts are correlated. Couple this with American Exceptionalist propaganda which created the myth and social elevation of the American Soldier as the ultimate freedom fighter / patriot and maybe you can sympathize with those who enlist.

      My point is not that individuals should be excused from being taken to task for their actions. Nor is it that all those who enlist are duped into it. It’s this: people are rarely lost causes, are often unguided, and live unexamined lives. So when confronting anyone: their personal context matters. When I’m struggling to find empathy I look to Daryl Davis. When we encounter ignorance, hate, and bigotry, we are right to oppose it. Always. How we do so should be conditioned, and possibly tempered, by the fact that we ourselves are ignorant to the context of the neighbors assigned to oppress us.

      Do not dismiss out of hand the power of speaking to reason and empathy in the face of violence and hate. Take them to task with the intention of educating a lost comrade. We must defend ourselves when the need arises but, prior to that Rubicon, we ought to acknowledge that were it not for circumstances outside our control so too could we have remained ignorant and been persuaded toward hate.

      There is no more stalwart an ally than one who has been given the tools to free themselves from chains they were sold as armor.

      • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Couple this with American Exceptionalist propaganda which created the myth and social elevation of the American Soldier as the ultimate freedom fighter / patriot and maybe you can sympathize with those who enlist.

        That myth. One of the things Umberto Eco discussed about in Ur-Fascism.

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        People who have decided to take up arms against other humans for money or ideology have passed some sort of rubicon I feel. They might be pursuaded to suppress their violent mercenary instincts for a while, but ultimately every violent repressive regime relies on these people, and has indoctrinated them accordingly.