• PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    302·
    1 year ago

    I’m not thinking that “lavatorial” is the correct word.

    That conjures “lavatory”, which is something different.

    For the science, yeah, more than enough water to cool the lava.

    That’s just my experience. If someone does the math, I’ll love them.

    • mb_@lemm.ee
      1·
      1 year ago

      If you replace the lava* with shit, the phrase still makes sense and is accurate

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      23·
      1 year ago

      Do what math? I honestly don’t know what you guy’s actually expect it to look like, so I don’t know where to start explaining.

      • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
        311·
        1 year ago

        Seriously? The lava in water math.

        It’s high school stuff if you bother to look up the specific heat and make some reasonable guesses.

          • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
            47·
            1 year ago

            No it’s not. Google specific heat of lava. Shit’s been done already.

            And not just for academics. Even Randall Monroe. He’s smart, but he’s not an academic.

            • Eheran@lemmy.world
              21·
              1 year ago

              Mate, I model thermal processes for a living. The question is: What is the question? What to calculate? What expectations are there to (dis)proof?

              • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
                1·
                1 year ago

                Bruh. Someone else on this thread has already clarified to you the easy and what I was expecting question: what happens to the water and lava in the water bucket.

                You already answered that question in this thread.

                • Eheran@lemmy.world
                  11·
                  1 year ago

                  “Bruh”, everyone knows what happens, we are looking at it in the video. Lava gets cold, water hot. Obviously. There is not much to go on about.