band_on_the_run@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 2 years agoHow geologists collect lavai.imgur.comimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1929arrow-down115
arrow-up1914arrow-down1imageHow geologists collect lavai.imgur.comband_on_the_run@lemmy.world to Mildly Interesting@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down2·2 years agoI’m not thinking that “lavatorial” is the correct word. That conjures “lavatory”, which is something different. For the science, yeah, more than enough water to cool the lava. That’s just my experience. If someone does the math, I’ll love them.
minus-squaremb_@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIf you replace the lava* with shit, the phrase still makes sense and is accurate
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 years agoDo what math? I honestly don’t know what you guy’s actually expect it to look like, so I don’t know where to start explaining.
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down11·2 years agoSeriously? The lava in water math. It’s high school stuff if you bother to look up the specific heat and make some reasonable guesses.
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·2 years agoIt’s masters degree in thermal fluids engineering math
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down7·edit-22 years agoNo it’s not. Google specific heat of lava. Shit’s been done already. And not just for academics. Even Randall Monroe. He’s smart, but he’s not an academic.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoMate, I model thermal processes for a living. The question is: What is the question? What to calculate? What expectations are there to (dis)proof?
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoBruh. Someone else on this thread has already clarified to you the easy and what I was expecting question: what happens to the water and lava in the water bucket. You already answered that question in this thread.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years ago“Bruh”, everyone knows what happens, we are looking at it in the video. Lava gets cold, water hot. Obviously. There is not much to go on about.
minus-squarePetDinosaurs@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
I’m not thinking that “lavatorial” is the correct word.
That conjures “lavatory”, which is something different.
For the science, yeah, more than enough water to cool the lava.
That’s just my experience. If someone does the math, I’ll love them.
If you replace the lava* with shit, the phrase still makes sense and is accurate
Do what math? I honestly don’t know what you guy’s actually expect it to look like, so I don’t know where to start explaining.
Seriously? The lava in water math.
It’s high school stuff if you bother to look up the specific heat and make some reasonable guesses.
It’s masters degree in thermal fluids engineering math
deleted by creator
No it’s not. Google specific heat of lava. Shit’s been done already.
And not just for academics. Even Randall Monroe. He’s smart, but he’s not an academic.
Mate, I model thermal processes for a living. The question is: What is the question? What to calculate? What expectations are there to (dis)proof?
Bruh. Someone else on this thread has already clarified to you the easy and what I was expecting question: what happens to the water and lava in the water bucket.
You already answered that question in this thread.
“Bruh”, everyone knows what happens, we are looking at it in the video. Lava gets cold, water hot. Obviously. There is not much to go on about.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator