• Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    The concern was the lack of knowledge that this was public. I noticed it’s in the article, I may have read over it

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Even if an officer’s name and badge number were not public (which would be weird, because both of these are a part of a police officer’s uniform), what is the concern about a tool which provides these?

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          9 days ago

          You believe that a police officer, who is doing public actions, in a public role, should be given privacy while performing public actions? Say more

          • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Yes and no. They’re still humans. They should be held accountable, but they should also have the privacy to live their lives.

            It’s not a simple black and white situation. There’s more nuance here