Civilloquy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago

Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors

www.ft.com

external-link
message-square
16
fedilink
153
external-link

Meta wins artificial intelligence copyright case in blow to authors

www.ft.com

IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month ago
message-square
16
fedilink
Meta wins AI copyright case in blow to authors
www.ft.com
external-link
Court finds using online books to train artificial intelligence models without writers’ consent is ‘fair use’

Link without the paywall

https://archive.ph/OgKUM

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    All I’m hearing is that pirating is A-OK as long as you claim it’s for model training

    • WatDabney@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sorry, but no. That’s just the paper-thin excuse.

      Pirating, like pretty much anything else that’s sometimes a crime in the current US, is A-OK if you can buy enough judges and politicians.

      • Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I just put a thin blue line sticker on my case and full send that bitch.

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The ruling explicitly does not allow pirating. It only lets you run ML training on legally acquired media.

      They still haven’t ruled on copyright infringement from pirating the media used to train, and they haven’t ruled on copyright status of outputs (what it takes to be considered transformative).

      This is judge Alsup, same guy who ruled in Oracle vs Google

      Edit: https://www.techdirt.com/2025/06/26/two-judges-same-district-opposite-conclusions-the-messy-reality-of-ai-training-copyright-cases/

  • mienshao@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    American law has become a literal fucking joke (IAAL). I could’ve guessed the could get the outcome of this case without any facts: the huge corporation wins over authors. American law is no longer capable of holding major corporations to account, so we need a new legal system—one that’s actually functional.

    • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you want a new constitution in the United States?

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Could start with a guillotine for corporations and see how that goes.

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        If a pact between enslavers is a complete failure, why not just make another one? \s

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      But the actual process of an AI system distilling from thousands of written works to be able to produce its own passages of text qualified as “fair use” under U.S. copyright law because it was “quintessentially transformative,” Alsup wrote.

      Thats the actual argument and the judge is right here. LLMs are transformative in every sense of the word. The technology is even called “transformers”.

      • actionjbone@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, well, I could call my dick the Magnum Opus but that wouldn’t make it two feet long.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The judge explicitly did not allow piracy here. Only legally acquired media can be used for training.

      Edit: https://www.techdirt.com/2025/06/26/two-judges-same-district-opposite-conclusions-the-messy-reality-of-ai-training-copyright-cases/

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      Someone didn’t read the article

      • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Again maybe you should give it another shot - piracy is still illegal but training is legal. How would “you torrenting movies” be alright here? You see how it makes no sense?

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d feel better about this if meta actually produced anything of value and I was able to also violate their copyright, but they’re just fucking leeches bro

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wow you mean the state serves capital? I thought for sure it would once again fight for the rights of artists and their extremely profitable IP. \s \s \s

  • C1pher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Of course it ended up that way. Who do you think lobbies for this kind of shit? Whos paying those who make the decisions?

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.19K users / day
  • 8.32K users / week
  • 12.8K users / month
  • 32.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 73.4K subscribers
  • 14.7K Posts
  • 457K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org