Several years ago, a mission team of laypersons preached the morning sermon at First Baptist Church of Abilene, Texas. They had just returned from completing medical and construction projects at a small Christian hospital in the mountains near Chihuahua, Mexico.

Their stories of building much-needed medicine cabinets and relationships, repairing clinic doors and broken bodies, and salvaging discarded equipment and forgotten lives touched our affluent congregation profoundly. In one testimony, a family physician summarized how he viewed their missionary efforts in that needy setting: “Some will call what we did the ‘Social Gospel’; I just call it ‘obedience.’”

This mention of the Social Gospel more than a decade ago highlights a misunderstanding that has been perpetuated by evangelical leaders and churches for a century. Quite recently, in fact, a friend told me that the “true gospel” is salvation through Jesus Christ, and not just doing good works.

But I contend that the true gospel is social. It has a personal aspect, of course, yet the implications of the true gospel are social. The first and greatest commandment is to love God with all our heart, soul and mind — and, for Christians, that means loving Jesus as the Incarnate Word, the human face of God. But the second mandate, as ultimate as the first, is to love our neighbors as we love ourselves (Matthew 22:36-40) — which grounds the social nature of the gospel in the person of Jesus himself.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I think we’re probably in agreement, I went into more detail in my comment, but in summary:

    It is difficult for me to comprehend how anyone could disentangle the documented word of Jesus in a sacred text from anything considered to be a “true” or “real” gospel.

    Not sure if people here are just going by the headline, but the point of this article is that the social aspects of the gospel can’t be ignored or disentangled to fit a narrative like “empathy is a disease” bc the “real” gospel isn’t concerned with the social. Whoever decided there was a “real” gospel, it definitely wasn’t Jesus, but people sure like to use his name to spread their message.

    • Flax@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      “empathy is a disease” is borderline heresy at best. Blasphemy at worst

      John 15:12-13

      This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends.

      Romans 5:7-8

      For one will scarcely die for a righteous person—though perhaps for a good person one would dare even to die— but God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us.

      If empathy is a disease, then God had that disease