Civilloquy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study

www.theregister.com

external-link
message-square
178
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@beehaw.org
871
external-link

AI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon study

www.theregister.com

Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
178
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@beehaw.org
Analysis: More fiction than science
  • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No the chances of being wrong 10x in a row are 2%. So the chances of being right at least once are 98%.

    • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      deleted by creator

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible.

        And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.

        • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          deleted by creator

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dunno. Asking 10 humans at random to do a task and probably one will do it better than AI. Just not as fast.

            • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              deleted by creator

    • 𝕛𝕨𝕞-𝕕𝕖𝕧@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.73K users / day
  • 6.55K users / week
  • 12.4K users / month
  • 22.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 89.8K subscribers
  • 20.2K Posts
  • 627K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org